The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determinants of E-Business Use in U.S. Firms
Open accessAbstract
The factors leading to variations in e-business use among U.S. firms are identified. Building on diffusion of innovation theory, an integrated model is developed that explains the relative influence of eight known determinants. Diversity and volume of e-business use are empirically investigated using a sample of 294 firms. The analysis demonstrates that (1) considering the diversity of e-business use, pressure from trading partners is the most important driver, (2) when e-business volume is investigated, government pressure emerges as the strongest factor, (3) government promotion may not have much effect on the diversity of e-business use by private companies, but does significantly influence the volume of e-business use by firms doing business with the government, and (4) the United States has a positive regulatory environment for supporting e-business. Taken together, these findings on the multidimensionality of e-business use show that diversity and volume are not only different measures of e-business use, but also have different determinants. The integrated model provides a more comprehensive explanation of e-business use and could serve as a foundation for future research on interorganizational systems.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“More studies, however, conclude that the organization's size positively impacts innovation [18] since larger organizations are more likely to have the financial resources to invest in new technologies and absorb the associated risks [19,20].”
Citations
Cites
Herne, H., Cooley, W. W., & Lohnes, P. R. (1973) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344428 · Cited by 35,801
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Kuhn, T. S., & Schlegel, R. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050879 · Cited by 35,538
The Theory of Economic Development
Schumpeter, J. A., & Backhaus, U. (2003) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-306-48082-4_3 · Cited by 22,757
The Competitive Advantage of Nations
Clark, T. W., & Porter, M. (1991) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251962 · Cited by 17,454
The Competitive Advantage of Nations
Porter, M. E. (1990) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-11336-1 · Cited by 15,654
Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy
Fukuyama, F., & Schumpeter, J. A. (1997) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20048211 · Cited by 15,349
An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment
Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378802500207 · Cited by 6,293
Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2001) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.187 · Cited by 5,564
Melville, N. P., Kraemer, & Gurbaxani, V. (2004) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148636 · Cited by 3,561
Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings
Tornatzky, L. G., & Klein, K. J. (1982) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.1982.6447463 · Cited by 3,401
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Fichman R.G. The diffusion and assimilation of information technology innovations. In R.B. Zmud (ed.)Framing the Domains of IT Management: Projecting the Future Through the Past. Cincinnati: Pinnaflex Education Resources, 2000, pp. 105-127.
- Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of Innovation. New York: Free Press, 1995.
- Schumpeter, J.A. Business Cycles. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Literature Review of Information Technology Adoption Models at Firm Level
(2011) · Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) · Cited by 1,341
Oliveira, T., Thomas, M. A., & Espadanal, M. (2014) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.03.006 · Cited by 1,340
Digital technologies and firm performance: The role of digital organisational culture
Martínez, E., Cegarra‐Navarro, J., & Alfonso-Ruiz, F. J. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119962 · Cited by 874
Understanding e-business adoption across industries in European countries
Oliveira, T., & Martins, M. F. (2010) · Industrial Management & Data Systems · doi:10.1108/02635571011087428 · Cited by 641
Big data analytics adoption: Determinants and performances among small to medium-sized enterprises
Maroufkhani, P., Tseng, M., Iranmanesh, M., Ismail, W. K. W., & Khalid, H. B. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102190 · Cited by 491
Metadata
- Authors
- Hsu, P.-F., Kraemer, K. L., & Dunkle, D.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- ORCID
- Hsu, Pei-Fang
- Venue
- International Journal of Electronic Commerce
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 9-45
- ISSN
- 1086-4415 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9301
- OpenAlex
- W2099552414
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 8.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- escholarship.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- International Journal of Electronic Commerce (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Business and International Management › E-commerce and Technology Innovations
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
- Keywords
- e-business adoption, diffusion of innovations, government pressure, government promotion, regulatory environment, interorganizational systems, US firms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
