Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,106

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effect of On-Line Consumer Reviews on Consumer Purchasing Intention: The Moderating Role of Involvement

Park, Do-Hyung, Lee, Jumin, Han, Ingoo·2007·International Journal of Electronic Commerce

Abstract

On-line consumer reviews, functioning both as informants and as recommenders, are important in making purchase decisions and for product sales. Their persuasive impact depends on both their quality and their quantity. This paper uses the elaboration likelihood model to explain how level of involvement with a product moderates these relationships. The study produces three major findings: (1) the quality of on-line reviews has a positive effect on consumers' purchasing intention, (2) purchasing intention increases as the number of reviews increases, and (3) low-involvement consumers are affected by the quantity rather than the quality of reviews, but high-involvement consumers are affected by review quantity mainly when the review quality is high. These findings have implications for on-line sellers in terms of how to manage on-line consumer reviews.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2753/jec1086-4415110405

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Chen, Y., and Xie, J. Online consumer review: A new element of marketing communications mix. Working Paper. University of Arizona, 2004 ( http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=618782#Paper-Download
  2. Dichter, E. How word-of-mouth advertising works. Harvard Business Review, 44, 6 (1966), 147-166.
  3. Kassarjian, H.H. Low involvement—A second look. In K.B. Monroe (ed.), Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 8. Ann Arbor: Association for Consumer Research, 1981, pp. 31-34.
  4. Zhu, J.H., and He, Z. Perceived characteristics, perceived needs, and perceived popularity. Communication Research, 29, 4 (2002), 466-495.

Cited by

See all 2,106

Metadata

Authors
Park, D.-H., Lee, J., & Han, I.
Venue
International Journal of Electronic Commerce
Published
2007-07
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
125-148
ISSN
  • 1086-4415 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9301
OpenAlex
W2029186508
Cited by
2,106
References
40
FWCI
73.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effect of On-Line Consumer Reviews on Consumer Purchasing Intention: The Moderating Role of Involvement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2753/jec1086-4415110405
The paper
Park, D.-H., Lee, J., & Han, I. (2007). The Effect of On-Line Consumer Reviews on Consumer Purchasing Intention: The Moderating Role of Involvement. International Journal of Electronic Commerce. https://doi.org/10.2753/jec1086-4415110405

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.