The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guidance on the risk assessment of the application of nanoscience and nanotechnologies in the food and feed chain
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The European Food Safety Authority has developed a practical approach for assessing potential risks arising from applications of nanoscience and nanotechnologies in the food and feed chain. Guidance is provided on: (i) the physico‐chemical characterisation requirements of engineered nanomaterials used e.g. as food additives, enzymes, flavourings, food contact materials, novel foods, feed additives and pesticides and; (ii) testing approaches to identify and characterise hazards arising from the nanoproperties which, in general, should include information from in vitro genotoxicity, absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion and repeated‐dose 90‐day oral toxicity studies in rodents. The guidance allows for reduced information to be provided when no exposure to the engineered nanomaterial is verified by data indicating no migration from food contact materials or when complete degradation/dissolution is demonstrated with no absorption of engineered nanomaterials as such. The guidance indicates uncertainties that should be considered to perform a risk assessment. As this sector is under fast development, this guidance document will be revised as appropriate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dissolution Testing as a Prognostic Tool for Oral Drug Absorption: Immediate Release Dosage Forms
Dressman, J. B., Amidon, G. L., Reppas, C., & Shah, V. P. (1998) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1023/a:1011984216775 · Cited by 1,097
Deposition and biokinetics of inhaled nanoparticles
Geiser, M., & Kreyling, W. G. (2010) · Particle and Fibre Toxicology · doi:10.1186/1743-8977-7-2 · Cited by 747
Cited by
Browne, M. A., Niven, S. J., Galloway, T. S., Rowland, S. J., & Thompson, R. C. (2013) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.10.012 · Cited by 1,160
Presence of microplastics and nanoplastics in food, with particular focus on seafood
(CONTAM), E. P. O. C. I. T. F. C. (2016) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4501 · Cited by 958
In vitro genotoxicity of polystyrene nanoparticles on the human fibroblast Hs27 cell line
Poma, A., Vecchiotti, G., Colafarina, S., Zarivi, O., Aloisi, M., Arrizza, L., Chichiriccò, G., & Di Carlo, P. (2019) · Nanomaterials · doi:10.3390/nano9091299 · Cited by 227
Production of conjugated fatty acids: A review of recent advances
Gong, M., Hu, Y., Wei, W., Jin, Q., & Wang, X. (2019) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.107454 · Cited by 55
The Essential Elements of a Risk Governance Framework for Current and Future Nanotechnologies
Stone, V., Führ, M., Feindt, P. H., Bouwmeester, H., Linkov, I., Sabella, S., Murphy, F., Bizer, K., Tran, L., Ågerstrand, M., et al. (2018) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.12954 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- EFSA Scientific Committee
- Venue
- EFSA Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-05
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2140-2140
- ISSN
- 1831-4732 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4246210435
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 31.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.