Cited by 84Consumer Attitudes and Food LabelingMicrobial Metabolism and ApplicationsMycotoxins in Agriculture and Food

Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of health claims related to monacolin K from red yeast rice and maintenance of normal blood LDL cholesterol concentrations (ID 1648, 1700) pursuant to Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006

Open access
EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA)·2011·EFSA Journal

Abstract

Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies was asked to provide a scientific opinion on a list of health claims pursuant to Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 1924No /2006.This opinion addresses the scientific substantiation of health claims in relation to monacolin K from red yeast rice and maintenance of normal blood LDL-cholesterol concentrations.The scientific substantiation is based on the information provided by the Member States in the consolidated list of Article 13 health claims and references that EFSA has received from Member States or directly from stakeholders.The food that is the subject of the health claim is red yeast rice (i.e.rice fermented with the red yeast Monascus purpureus).The Panel considers that, whereas red yeast rice is not sufficiently characterised in relation to the claimed effect, the food constituent, monacolin K from red yeast rice, is sufficiently characterised.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2304

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, N. A. A. (.
Corresponding author
EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA)
Venue
EFSA Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-07
Volume
9
Issue
7
ISSN
1831-4732 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2913766220
Cited by
84
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EFSA Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Microbial Metabolism and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Keywords
lovastatin, red yeast rice, Monascus purpureus, health claims, LDL cholesterol, serum cholesterol, cholesterol-lowering effect, Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review