Cited by 36Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthNatural Products and Biological ResearchCholesterol and Lipid Metabolism

Comparison of low-dose statin versus low-dose statin + Armolipid Plus in high-intensity statin-intolerant patients with a previous coronary event and percutaneous coronary intervention (ADHERENCE Trial)

Marazzi, Giuseppe, Campolongo, Giuseppe, Pelliccia, Francesco, Quattrino, Silvia, Vitale, Cristiana, Cacciotti, Luca, Massaro, Rosalba, Volterrani, Maurizio +1 more·2017·The American Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction is associated with a significant decrease in mortality, and statins represent the most effective drugs to achieve this. However, side effects of statins are very common and may lead to treatment discontinuation. Nutraceuticals are a combination of natural components that have shown efficacy in lowering LDL-C concentration when used alone or in association with other agents in patients who are intolerant to high-dose statins. Our aim was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of low-dose statin (LDS) therapy versus combined therapy of LDS plus a nutraceutical combination containing red yeast rice, policosanol, berberine, folic acid, coenzyme Q10 and astaxanthin (Armolipid Plus) in high-risk patients. We performed a randomized (1:1), prospective, parallel group, single-blind trial in which participants had coronary artery disease (n = 100), had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention in the preceding 12 months, were high-dose statin intolerant, and did not achieve ≥50% reduction in LDL-C with LDS treatment alone. After 3 months, patients in the LDS + Armolipid Plus (n = 50) group presented with a significantly greater reduction of LDL-C and total cholesterol (p <0.0001), and 70% of patients in this group achieved the therapeutic target (LDL-C <70 mg/dl), whereas patients in the LDS group did not. Six patients (3 from each group) dropped out due to myalgia. In conclusion, in patients with coronary artery disease and high-dose statin intolerance, the combination of LDS and nutraceuticals represents a valuable therapeutic option.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.06.015

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the ADHERENCE trial, after 3 months the LDS plus Armolipid Plus group had significant LDL-C and TC reductions and 70% reached LDL-C <70 mg/dl, while the LDS group did not.

    “After 3 months, patients in the LDS þ Armolipid Plus (n ¼ 50) group had a substantial reduction in LDL-C (À26.8%;p < 0.0001) and TC (À17.5;p < 0.0001), and 70% of patients in this group reached the treatment target (LDL-C <70 mg/dl), whereas patients in the LDS group did not (145).”

    From The Role of Nutraceuticals in Statin Intolerant Patients (2018) · cites this paper as [145]

  • Armolipid Plus lowers TC by 11-21% and LDL-C by 15-31%, equivalent to low-dose statin changes.

    “Armolipid Plus induces reductions in TC (11% to 21%; p ¼ 0.001) and LDL-C (15% to 31%; p ¼ 0.001) levels, which is equivalent to changes associated with LDS.”

    From The Role of Nutraceuticals in Statin Intolerant Patients (2018) · cites this paper as [145]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marazzi, G., Campolongo, G., Pelliccia, F., Quattrino, S., Vitale, C., Cacciotti, L., Massaro, R., Volterrani, M., & Rosano, G.
Affiliations
  • Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Corresponding author
Marazzi, Giuseppe
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
120
Issue
6
Pages
893-897
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2726914836
Cited by
36
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
5.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca
  • European Regional Development Fund
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Natural Products and Biological Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
Keywords
low-dose statins, statin intolerance, high-intensity statin therapy, LDL cholesterol lowering, nutraceuticals, red yeast rice, policosanol, berberine, folic acid, coenzyme Q10, astaxanthin, coronary artery disease, percutaneous coronary intervention, LDL-C goal attainment, statin adverse effects, myalgia
MeSH terms
Aged, Biological Products, Cholesterol, Coronary Artery Disease, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Combinations, Drug Therapy, Combination, Drug Tolerance, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Dietary Supplements, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review