The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Safety and efficacy of pyrazine derivatives including saturated ones belonging to chemical group 24 when used as flavourings for all animal species
Open accessAbstract
Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of 22 compounds belonging to chemical group 24 (pyrazine derivatives).They are currently authorised as flavours in food.The FEEDAP Panel concludes that: 2,3-diethylpyrazine [14.005], 2-ethyl-3methylpyrazine [14.006], 5,6,7,8-tetrahydroquinoxaline [14.015], 2,3,5,6-tetramethylpyrazine [14.018], 2,3,5-trimethylpyrazine [14.019], 2,5-dimethylpyrazine [14.020], 2,6-dimethylpyrazine [14.021], 2ethylpyrazine [14.022], 2-ethyl-3,5-dimethylpyrazine [14.024], 2,5 or 6-methoxy-3-methylpyrazine [14.025], 2-methylpyrazine [14.027], acetylpyrazine [14.032], 6,7-dihydro-5-methyl-5H-cyclopenta(b) pyrazine [14.037], 2-isobutyl-3-methoxypyrazine [14.043], 2-acetyl-3-ethylpyrazine [14.049], 2,3dimethylpyrazine [14.050], 2,3-diethyl-5-methylpyrazine [14.056], 2-(sec-butyl)-3-methoxypyrazine [14.062], 3,(5-or 6-)-dimethyl-2-ethylpyrazine [14.100], 2-ethyl-3-methoxypyrazine [14.112] and 2methoxy-3-methylpyrazine [14.126] are safe at the proposed maximum dose level (0.5 mg/kg complete feed) as feed for cattle, salmonids and non-food-producing animals, and at the proposed normal use level of 0.1 mg/kg complete feed for pigs and poultry; 5-methylquinoxaline [14.028] are safe only at concentrations below the proposed use levels (0.08 mg/kg complete feed for cattle, salmonids and nonfood-producing animals, and 0.05 mg/kg complete feed for pigs and poultry).No safety concern would arise for the consumer from the use of these compounds up to the highest proposed level in feeds.Hazards for skin and eye contact, and respiratory exposure are recognised for the majority of the compounds under application.Most are classified as irritating to the respiratory system.The proposed maximum use levels in feed are unlikely to have detrimental effects on the terrestrial and fresh water compartments.Because all the compounds under assessment are used in food as flavourings and their function in feed is essentially the same as that in food, no further demonstration of efficacy is necessary.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- Blevins, 2012, Liver enzymes in White Leghorns selected for the sheep red blood cell immune response, Poultry Science, 91, 322, 10.3382/ps.2011-01764 · DOI
- Court, 2013, Feline drug metabolism and disposition: pharmacokinetic evidence for species differences and molecular mechanisms, The Veterinary Clinics of North America. Small Animal Practice, 43, 1039, 10.1016/j.cvsm.2013.05.002 · DOI
- EFSA, 2008, Flavouring Group Evaluation 53 (FGE.53): Consideration of phenethyl alcohol, aldehyde, acid and related acetals and esters evaluated by JECFA (59th meeting) structurally related to phenethyl alcohol, aldehyde, esters and related phenylacetic acid esters evaluated by EFSA in FGE.14 (2005) and one phenoxyethyl ester evaluated in FGE.23 (2006) (Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2000 of 18 July 2000) – Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids and Materials in contact with Food (AFC), EFSA Journal, 6, 710, 10.2903/j.efsa.2008.710 · DOI
- EFSA, 2008, Technical Guidance of the Scientific Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) for assessing the safety of feed additives for the environment, EFSA Journal, 6, 842, 10.2903/j.efsa.2008.842 · DOI
- EFSA CEF Panel, 2011, Scientific Opinion on the Flavouring Group Evaluation 50, Revision 1 (FGE.50Rev1): Consideration of pyrazine derivatives evaluated by JECFA (57th meeting) structurally related to pyrazine derivatives evaluated by EFSA in FGE.17Rev2 (2010) (Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2000 of 18 July 2000), EFSA Journal, 9, 1921, 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.1921 · DOI
- EFSA CEF Panel, 2011, Scientific Opinion on the Flavouring Group Evaluation 17, Revision 3 (FGE.17Rev3): pyrazine derivatives from chemical group 24, EFSA Journal, 9, 2456, 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2456 · DOI
- EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2012, Guidance for the preparation of dossiers for sensory additives, EFSA Journal, 10, 2534, 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2534 · DOI
- EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2012, Guidance for the preparation of dossiers for additives already authorised for use in food, EFSA Journal, 10, 2538, 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2538 · DOI
- EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2012, Guidance for establishing the safety of additives for the consumer, EFSA Journal, 10, 2537, 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2537 · DOI
- EFSA FEEDAP Panel, 2012, Guidance on studies concerning the safety of use of the additive for users/workers, EFSA Journal, 10, 2539, 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2539 · DOI
- Jakoby, 1980, Biochemical Pharmacology and Toxicology, 281
- Fink‐Gremmels, 2008, Implications of hepatic cytochrome P450‐related biotransformation processes in veterinary sciences, European Journal of Pharmacology, 585, 502, 10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.03.013 · DOI
- Gupta, 2007, Veterinary Toxicology. Basic and Clinical Principles, 10.5005/jp/books/10078 · DOI
- Gusson, 2006, Comparison of hydrolitic and conjugative biotransformations pathways in horse, cattle, pig, broiler chick, rabbit and rat liver subcellular fractions, Veterinary Research Communications, 30, 271, 10.1007/s11259-006-3247-y · DOI
- Rose, 2013, Trace Elements in Health: A Review of Current Issues, 150
- Hawksworth, 1975, Metabolism in the rat of some pyrazine derivatives having flavour importance in foods, Xenobiotica, 5, 389, 10.3109/00498257509056108 · DOI
- Ioannides, 2006, Cytochrome P450 expression in the liver of food‐producing animals, Current Drug Metabolism, 7, 335, 10.2174/138920006776873544 · DOI
- James, 1987, Conjugation of organic pollutants in aquatic species, Environmental Health Perspectives, 71, 97, 10.1289/ehp.877197 · DOI
- Morikawa, 1997, Distribution and pathophysiologic role of molybdenum‐containing enzymes, Histology and Histopathology, 12, 513
- Müller, 2010, Pyrazine: occurrence, formation and biodegradation, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 85, 1315, 10.1007/s00253-009-2362-4 · DOI
- Nebbia, 2003, Comparative expression of liver cytochrome P450‐dependent monooxygenases in the horse and in other agricultural and laboratory species, Veterinary Journal, 165, 53, 10.1016/S1090-0233(02)00174-0 · DOI
- Posternak, 1969, Summaries of toxicological data. Toxicological tests on flavouring matters, Food Cosmetic Toxicology, 7, 405, 10.1016/S0015-6264(69)80418-9 · DOI
- Posternak, 1975, Summaries of toxicological data. Toxicological tests on flavouring matters. II. Pyrazines and other compounds, Food and Cosmetic Toxicology, 13, 487, 10.1016/S0015-6264(75)80215-X · DOI
- Watkins, 1986, Xenobiotic biotransformation in livestock: comparison to other species commonly used in toxicity testing, Journal of Animal Science, 63, 933, 10.2527/jas1986.633933x · DOI
- Wolf, 2005, A brief overview of nonneoplastic hepatic toxicity in fish, Toxicologic Pathology, 33, 75, 10.1080/01926230590890187 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Liu, X., Yang, W., Gu, H., Bughio, A. A., & Liu, J. (2024) · Fermentation · doi:10.3390/fermentation10020112 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- (FEEDAP), E. P. O. A. A. P. O. S. U. I. A. F., Rychen, G., Aquilina, G., Azimonti, G., Bampidis, V., de Lourdes Bastos, M., Bories, G., Cocconcelli, P. S., Flachowsky, G., Gropp, J., Kolar, B., Kouba, M., López Puente, S., López‐Alonso, M., Mantovani, A., Mayo, B., Ramos, F., Saarela, M., Villa, R. E., Wallace, R. J., Wester, P., Brantom, P., Dusemund, B., Hogstrand, C., Van Beelen, P., Westendorf, J., Gregoretti, L., Manini, P., & Chesson, A.
- ORCID
- Venue
- EFSA Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-02
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e04671-e04671
- ISSN
- 1831-4732 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7009992
- OpenAlex
- W2584862832
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 1.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- EFSA Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- OpenAgrar (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Dye analysis and toxicity
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
- Keywords
- pyrazine derivatives, flavourings, feed additives, food flavourings, safety assessment, respiratory irritation, consumer exposure, environmental fate, cattle, salmonids, pigs, poultry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review