ASSESSING ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE CAPABILITY THROUGH A MULTISECTORAL STUDY: DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOMETRIC VALIDATION OF THE “CHANGE MANAGEMENT SCALE”
Open accessAbstract
In today’s dynamic organizational environments, the capability to manage change effectively has become a critical determinant of institutional success and sustainability. This study aims to develop and validate the Change Management Scale (CMS), a multidimensional tool designed to assess organizations’ ability to plan, implement, and institutionalize change. The research employed a quantitative design and collected data from three sectors—education, healthcare, and energy/renewable energy—where change processes are both rapid and deeply impactful. To establish the structural validity of the CMS, Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were conducted on data obtained from three independent sample groups. Criterion-related validity was examined through correlations between the CMS and the Openness to Organizational Change Scale, demonstrating a positive and significant relationship. The EFA and CFA results supported a three-factor structure—Strategic Decision and Leadership, Preparation and Planning, and Implementation, Monitoring, and Institutionalization—with satisfactory model fit indices. Reliability analyses revealed Cronbach’s alpha coefficients above .70 for all dimensions, indicating high internal consistency. The findings confirm that the CMS is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring change management practices across diverse organizational settings. Its concise structure and sector-neutral design make it suitable for application in various industries and cultural contexts. The CMS contributes to both theory and practice by providing researchers and practitioners with a practical framework for assessing, monitoring, and enhancing organizational change capability. The scale items are presented in both English and Turkish at the end of the study.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334 · see citing works
The determinants of organizational change management success: Literature review and case study
Errida, A., & Lotfi, B. (2021) · International Journal of Engineering Business Management · doi:10.1177/18479790211016273 · Cited by 399 · see citing works
Are digital natives open to change? Examining flexible thinking and resistance to change
Barak, M. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.016 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Evidence-based change management
Rousseau, D. M., & ten Have, S. (2022) · Organizational Dynamics · doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2022.100899 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Çalışkan, A.
- Affiliations
- Toros University (TR)
- Corresponding author
- Çalışkan, Abdullah
- ORCID
- Çalışkan, Abdullah
- Venue
- Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi
- Published
- 2025-12-25
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 65-94
- ISSN
- 2149-5823 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7117303394
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3
- FWCI
- 2.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Change and Leadership
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Management and Change
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Management and Leadership
- Keywords
- change management, scale development, psychometric validation, education sector, health sector
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review