Cited by 6Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Psychometric Properties and Factor Structure of Body Awareness Questionnaire

Open access
Taherifar, Zahra, Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Tehran, DehghaniArani, Fateme, Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Tehran, Mootabi, Fereshteh, Assistant Professor, Family Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, Fata, Ladan, Assistant Professor, Iran University of Medical Sciences +2 more·2019·Biannual Journal of Contemporary Psychology

Abstract

Recently, a construct called "body awareness" has been defined in the field of health, which means focusing on and awareness of internal physical senses.Body awareness is known as a two facet construct that can have adaptive and maladaptive dimension.Despite the importance of such construct in the mental health, the psychometric properties of questionnaire that assess body awareness, have not been investigated in Iran.In this regard, the purpose of the present study was assessing psychometric properties of Persian version of body awareness Questionnaire (Shields, Mallory and Simon, 1989).Data were collected after translating into Persian and translating the modified Persian text into the original language.The body awareness questionnaire was distributed between 238 students of university of Tehran.Data was analyzed using, Pearson`s correlation, Cronbach's alpha and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.Cronbach's alpha coefficient of body awareness questionnaire was 0.88.Convergent validity was assessed using the subscales of Experience Questionnaire (decentering subscale) and Pennsylvania State Worry Questionnaire was used to assess divergent validity.Correlation coefficient (r=0.3) and non-significant correlation coefficient (r=0.02) were obtained.In exploratory factor analysis of this questionnaire, 4 factors were obtained and the confirmatory factor analysis was conducted for such 4 factors model.and this 4-factor model fitted well (RMSEA = 0.06; Chi-square/ df= 2.15).This study provides promising evidence of the psychometric properties of the Physical Awareness Questionnaire in the nonclinical student population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.29252/bjcp.14.1.69

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Iranian version of the DASS-21 has acceptable internal consistency for depression (a = 0.85), anxiety (a = 0.83), and stress (a = 0.81).

    “An Iranian study conducted by Taherifar et al. (2019) showed acceptable internal consistency for depression (a = 0.85), anxiety (a = 0.83), and stress (a = 0.81) (Asghari et al., 2008).”

    From The Iranian form of psychometric properties of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (2022) · cites this paper as Taherifar et al., 2019

    The Abstract reports Cronbach’s alpha of 0.88 for the Persian Body Awareness Questionnaire, not for the DASS-21. Searches of our copy for DASS-21, the three reported coefficients, and Asghari (2008) found no passage addressing the claimed depression, anxiety, and stress reliabilities. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Cameron, O. (2002). Visceral sensory neuroscience. Interoception. New York (NY): Oxford University Press.
  2. Cioffi, D. (1991). Beyond attentional strategies: cognitive- perceptual model of somatic interpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 109(1), 25-41. [DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.109.1.25] [PMid:2006227] · DOI · Paper page
  3. Courtois, I., Cools, F., & Calsius, J. (2015). Effectiveness of body awareness interventions in fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Bodywork & Movement Therapies, 19, 35-56. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbmt.2014.04.003] [PMid:25603742] · DOI
  4. D' Alcala, C. R., Webster, D. G., & Esteves, J. E. (2015). Interoception, body awareness and chronic pain: Results from a case-control study. International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine, 18, 22-32. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijosm. 2014.08.003 · DOI
  5. Eccleston, C., Crombez, G., Aldrich, S., & Stannard, C. (1997). Attention and somatic awareness in chronic pain. Pain, 72, 209-215. [DOI:10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00030-4 · DOI
  6. Gard, G., Nyboe, L., & Gyllensten, A. L. (2019). Clinical reasoning and clinical use of basic body awareness therapy in physiotherapy -a qualitative study? European Journal of Physiotherapy, 1-7. [DOI:10.1080/21679169.2018.15495 · DOI
  7. Hanley, A. W., Mehling, W. E., & Garland, E. L. (2017). Holding the body in mind: Interoceptive awareness, dispositional mindfulness and psychological well-being. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 99, 13-20. [DOI:10.1016/j. jpsychores.2017.05.014] [PMid:28712417] [PMCid:PMC552 2814] · DOI · Paper page
  8. Hathaway, S. R., & Mckinley, J. C. (1940). A Multiphasic Personality Schedule (Minnesota): I. Construction of the Schedule, The Journal of Psychology, 10, 249-254. [DOI:10. 1080/00223980.1940.9917000] · DOI
  9. Hielschera, E., Whitfordd, T. J., Scotta, J. G., & Zopf, R. (2019). When the body is the target-Representations of one's own body and bodily sensations in self-harm: A systematic review. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 101, 85-112. [DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.03.007] [PMid:30878499] · DOI
  10. Lopez, A. L. S., & Moore, S. (2018). Dimensions of Body- Awareness and Depressed Mood and Anxiety. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 41, 834-853. [DOI:10.1177/ 0193945918798374] [PMid:30178716] · DOI
  11. Meyer, T. J., Miller, M. L., Metzyer, R. L., & Borkovec, T. D. (1990). Development and validation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire. Behavior Research & Therapy, 28, 487-495. [DOI:10.1016/0005-7967(90)90135-6 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Michalak, J., & Burg, J., & Heidenreich, T. (2012). Don't Forget Your Body: Mindfulness, Embodiment, and the Treatment of Depression. Mindfulness, 3, 190-199. [DOI:10.1007/ s12671-012-0107-4] · DOI
  13. Pintado, S. (2019). Changes in body awareness and self- compassion in clinical psychology trainees through a mindfulness program. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 34, 229-234. [DOI:10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.12.010] [PMid:30712731] · DOI · Paper page
  14. Pricea, C. J., Merrill, J. O., McCartya, R. L., Pikec, K. C., & Tsuib, J. I. (in press). A pilot study of mindful body awareness training as an adjunct to office-based medication treatment of opioid use disorder. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment.
  15. Rivest-Gadbois, E., & Boudriasa, M-H. (2019). What are the known effects of yoga on the brain in relation to motor performances, body awareness and pain? A narrative review. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 44, 129- 142. [DOI:10.1016/j.ctim.2019.03.021] [PMid:31126545] · DOI
  16. Schauder, K. B., Mash, L. E., Bryant, L. K., & Cascio, C. J. (2015). Interoceptive ability and body awareness in autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 131, 193-200. [DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2014.11. 002] [PMid:25498876] [PMCid:PMC4303499] · DOI · Paper page
  17. Shields, S. A., & Simon, A. (1991). Is awareness of bodily change in emotion related to awareness of other bodily processes? Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 96-109. [DOI:10. 1207/s15327752jpa5701_12] [PMid:1920039] · DOI
  18. Shirinzadeh Dastgiri, S. (2006). Comparison of Metacognitive and Responsibility Beliefs in Patients with Obsessive- Compulsive Disorder, Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Normal Individuals (Unpublished master's thesis). Shiraz University, Shiraz.
  19. Siroisa, F. M., Bannc, C. M., & Walshd, E. G. (2018). The role of mind-body awareness in the outcomes of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). European Journal of Integrative Medicine, 22, 37-43. [DOI:10.1016/j.eujim. 2018.07.008 · DOI
  20. Taherifar, Z., Ferdowsi, S., Mootabi, F., Mazaheri Tehrani, M. A., & Fata, L. (2017). Assessing "decentering": Validity, reliability and factor structure of experiences questionnaire in university students. Knowledge & Research in Applied Psychology, 18 (1), 46-56.
  21. Tsur, N., Berkovitz, N., & Ginzburg, K. (2015). Body Awareness, Emotional Clarity, and Authentic Behavior: The Moderating Role of Mindfulness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 1451-1472. [DOI:10.1007/s10902-015-9652-6] · DOI
  22. Watkins, E., & Teasdale, J. D. (2004). Adaptive and maladaptive self-focus in depression. Journal of affective disorders. 82 (1), 1-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2003.10.006] [PMid:15465571] · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taherifar, Z., Assistant Professor, D. O. P., DehghaniArani, F., Assistant Professor, D. O. P., Mootabi, F., Assistant Professor, F. R. I., Fata, L., Assistant Professor, I. U. O. M. S., AghababaeiNajar, Z., & B. S. in Psychology of Exceptional Children, S. B. U.
Affiliations
  • University of Tehran (IR)
  • Shahid Beheshti University (IR)
  • Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Taherifar, Zahra
Venue
Biannual Journal of Contemporary Psychology
Published
2019-08-01
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
69-78
ISSN
2008-1243 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3008317919
Cited by
6
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.39
Type
journal article
Language
fa
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
Biannual Journal of Contemporary Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
body awareness, Persian translation, psychometric properties, factor structure, convergent validity, discriminant validity, university students, decentering, worry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review