Cited by 187Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsAction Observation and Synchronization

Interoceptive Ability and Body Awareness in Autism Spectrum Disorder

Open access
Schauder, Kimberly B., Mash, Lisa E., Bryant, Lauren K., Cascio, Carissa J.·2015·Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) has been associated with various sensory atypicalities across multiple domains. Interoception, the ability to detect and attend to internal bodily sensations, has been found to moderate the experience of body ownership, a known difference in ASD that may affect social function. However, interoception has not been empirically examined in ASD. In the current study, 45 children (21 with ASD and 24 controls) ages 8 to 17 years completed a heartbeat perception paradigm as a measure of interoceptive ability. A subset of these children also completed the rubber hand illusion task, a multisensory paradigm probing the malleability of perceived body ownership. Although the heartbeat perception paradigm yielded comparable interoceptive awareness (IA) overall across both groups, children with ASD were superior at mentally tracking their heartbeats over longer intervals, suggesting increased sustained attention to internal cues in ASD. In addition, IA was negatively correlated with rubber hand illusion susceptibility in both groups, supporting a previously demonstrated inverse relationship between internal awareness and one's ability to incorporate external stimuli into one's perception of self. We propose a trade-off between attention to internal cues and attention to external cues, whereby attentional resources are disproportionately allocated to internal, rather than external, sensory cues in ASD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.11.002

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Such findings align with theories proposing altered interoception and sensory aversions in ASD, which manifest across multiple functional domains.

    “Such findings align with theories proposing altered interoception and sensory aversions in ASD, which manifest across multiple functional domains, including motor output, feeding routines, and sleep patterns [44].”

    From The Prevalence and Clinical Significance of Toe Walking in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Cross-Sectional Study in an Italian Pediatric Sample (2025) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Introduction describes atypical sensory processing across multiple modalities in ASD, and the Discussion proposes atypical processing of interoceptive cues. The paper does not establish sensory aversions or their manifestation in motor output, feeding routines, and sleep patterns; its mention of food concerns a reported neural response to pictures of food while fasting, not feeding routines. No page numbers are supplied in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Autism appears to affect HCT performance differently at different intervals, with autistic children numerically outperforming neurotypical children at long intervals.

    “Relatedly, autism appears to affect HCT performance differently at different intervals, with autistic children numerically outperforming neurotypical children at long intervals (Schauder et al., 2014).”

    From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Schauder et al., 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schauder, K. B., Mash, L. E., Bryant, L. K., & Cascio, C. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Rochester (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Cascio, Carissa J.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
131
Pages
193-200
ISSN
0022-0965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094877663
Cited by
187
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 5
FWCI
5.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Child Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Slifka/Ritvo Innovation in Autism Research Award
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K01 MH090232)
  • The National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1 TR000445)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, interoception, interoceptive awareness, body awareness, body ownership, heartbeat perception, rubber hand illusion, multisensory integration, attention allocation, children
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention, Awareness, Body Image, Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Cues, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Illusions, Male, Self Concept, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review