Cited by 426Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Beyond attentional strategies: a cognitive-perceptual model of somatic interpretation

Cioffi, Delia·1991·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

The meaning people assign to physical sensations can have profound implications for their physical and psychological health. A predominant research question in somatic interpretation asks if it is more adaptive to distract one's attention away from a potentially unpleasant sensation or to focus one's attention on it. This question, however, has yielded equivocal answers. Many apparent ambiguities in this research can be traced to a failure to distinguish the content of a person's attention from its mere direction or degree. A model of somatic interpretation is discussed, incorporating not only perceptual focus but also the attributions, goals, coping strategies, and prior hypotheses of the perceiver, thus delineating the psychobiological conditions under which various attentional strategies should be adaptive. In contrast to the prevailing concern with when and why somatic distraction doesn't "work," this conceptual analysis also considers when and why somatic attention does. Theoretical and methodological issues are discussed, as is the potential utility of somatic attention in cardiac rehabilitation and multiple sclerosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0033-2909.109.1.25

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The body awareness literature suggests that heightened awareness of bodily sensations often serves as markers for a variety of mental disorders including anxiety, panic disorder, depression, eating disorders, somatization, and others.

    “For instance, the BA literature, which is slanted toward a clinical population, suggests that heightened awareness of bodily sensations often serves as markers for a variety of mental disorders including anxiety, panic disorder, depression, eating disorders, somatization, and others (Cioffi, 1991; Pollatos et al., 2008, 2009; Mehling et al., 2009; Herbert and Pollatos, 2014; Mallorquí-Bagué et al.”

    From Mindfulness, Interoception, and the Body: A Contemporary Perspective (2019) · cites this paper as Cioffi, 1991

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cioffi, D.
Affiliations
University of Houston (US)
Corresponding author
Cioffi, Delia
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
1991
Volume
109
Issue
1
Pages
25-41
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W2059450453
Cited by
426
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 19
FWCI
8.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
attentional strategies, attentional focus, bodily sensations, coping strategies, cardiac rehabilitation, multiple sclerosis, psychobiology
MeSH terms
Arousal, Attention, Awareness, Humans, Perception, Sensation, Sick Role, Somatoform Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review