Cited by 23Sports Performance and TrainingBody Composition Measurement TechniquesSports Dynamics and Biomechanics

Anthropometric Characteristics and Somatotype of Professional Soccer Players by Position

Open access
MM, Cavia, A, Moreno, B, Fernández-Trabanco, C, Carrillo, SR, Alonso-Torre·2019·Journal of Sports Medicine and Therapy

Abstract

The anthropometric characteristics are decisive for an optimal physical level and, therefore, a good level in the game; and they can be different depending on the game position. The aim of this study was to identify the physical characteristics, body composition and somatotype of professional soccer players and to verify differences according to their playing positions: goalkeepers, defenders, forwards and midfielders. The measurements were performed on 57 male players of a soccer team of the Spanish Football League One. Twenty seven anthropometric variables were measured (height and body weight, four bone breadths, eleven girths and ten skinfolds) and the Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis was also performed. The percentage of body fat has been determined from 11 different equations. Goalkeepers showed the highest weight (80.2 ± 3.2 kg), supraespinal (10.5 ± 3.8 mm) and abdominal (15.6 ± 3.5 mm) skinfolds than others positions. In relation to body fat percentages, similar results were obtained from the equations of Jackson-Pollock (from 3 and 7 skinfolds), Carter, Withers, and Heyward and Stolarczyk (mean value 7.8 ± 1.5%). Higher results were obtained from the other equations applied. Differences among positions were also found concerning body composition; goalkeepers showed the highest body fat percentage (9.4 ± 1.4%). Mean somatotype was also different among positions; goalkeepers and forwards presented a balanced mesomorph somatotype while defenders and midfielders showed an ecto-mesomorph one. The differences in morphological characteristics according to the team position were notice only in goalkeepers, especially regarding their weight, abdominal and supraespinale skinfolds and the percentage of fat tissue.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.29328/journal.jsmt.1001047

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Matkovic BR, Misigoj-Durakovic M, Matkovic B, Jankovic S and Ruzic L, et al. Morphological differences of elite Croatian soccer players according to the team position. Coll Antropol. 2003; 7: S167-S174. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12955906
  2. Lukaski HC. Body composition: health and performance in exercise and sport. 1 st ed. Taylor & Francis Group: London, UK. 2917; 401.
  3. Faulkner J. Physiology of swimming and diving. In: H. Falls (Ed.), Exercise Physiology. Baltimore: Academic Press. 1968; 415-445.
  4. Heyward VH, Stolarczyk LM. Body composition basics. In: V.H. Heyward and L.M. Stolarczyk (Eds.), Applied body composition assessment. Champaign IL: Human Kinetics Publishers. 1996; 2-20.
  5. Herrero A. Cineantropometría: Composición Corporal y Somatotipo de futbolistas que desarrollan su actividad en la Comunidad de Madrid. [Cineanthropometry: Body Composition and Somatotype of soccer players who develop their activity in the Community of Madrid]. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid. 2004.
  6. Do Prado WL, Botero JP, Fernandes Guerra RL, Lopes Rodrigues C and Cuvello LC, et al. Anthropometric profi le and macronutrient intake in profesional Brazilian soccer players according to their fi eld positioning. Rev Bras Med Esporte. 2006; 12: 52e-55e.
  7. Cossio-Bolaños M, Santi Maria T. Composición corporal de futbolistas profesionales titulares y reservas. [Body composition of professional football players and reserves]. Rev Peru Cienc Act Fís. 2014; 1: 19-25.
  8. Zúñiga U, de León LG. Somatotipo en futbolistas semiprofesionales clasifi cados por su posición de juego. [Somatotype in semi- professional players classifi ed by their playing position]. Int J Sports Sci. 2007; 9: 29-36.
  9. Esparza Ros F, Alvero Cruz JR. Somatotipo. [Somatotype]. In: F. Esparza Ros (Ed.), Manual de Cineantropometría Madrid: Grupo Español de Cineantropometría. 1ª edición. Monografías FEMEDE. 1993; 25-47.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MM, C., A, M., B, F.-T., C, C., & SR, A.-T.
Venue
Journal of Sports Medicine and Therapy
Published
2019-11-01
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
073-080
ISSN
2573-1726 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2988311519
Cited by
23
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Sports Medicine and Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
Keywords
anthropometry, somatotype, professional football players, playing position, body composition, body fat percentage, skinfold thickness, goalkeepers, defenders, forwards, midfielders, bioelectrical impedance analysis, body mass index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review