The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Clinical Myocardial Perfusion PET/CT
Open accessAbstract
The field of nuclear cardiology is witnessing growing interest in the use of cardiac PET for the evaluation of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The available evidence suggests that myocardial perfusion PET provides an accurate means for diagnosing obstructive CAD, which appears superior to SPECT especially in the obese and in those undergoing pharmacologic stress. The ability to record changes in left ventricular function from rest to peak stress and to quantify myocardial perfusion (in mL/min/g of tissue) provides an added advantage over SPECT for evaluating multivessel CAD. There is growing and consistent evidence that gated myocardial perfusion PET also provides clinically useful risk stratification. Although the introduction of hybrid PET/CT technology offers the exciting possibility of assessing the extent of anatomic CAD (CT coronary angiography) and its functional consequences (ischemic burden) in the same setting, there are technical challenges in the implementation of CT-based transmission imaging for attenuation correction. Nonetheless, this integrated platform for assessing anatomy and biology offers a great potential for translating advances in molecularly targeted imaging into humans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fletcher, G. F., Ades, P. A., Kligfield, P., Arena, R., Balady, G. J., Bittner, V. A., Coke, L. A., Fleg, J. L., Forman, D. E., Gerber, T. C., et al. (2013) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e31829b5b44 · Cited by 2,235
Synthesis of 11C, 18F, 15O, and 13N Radiolabels for Positron Emission Tomography
Miller, P. W., Long, N. J., Vilar, R., & Gee, A. D. (2008) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200800222 · Cited by 894
PET versus SPECT: strengths, limitations and challenges
Rahmim, A., & Zaidi, H. (2008) · Nuclear Medicine Communications · doi:10.1097/mnm.0b013e3282f3a515 · Cited by 834
Dorbala, S., Hachamovitch, R., Curillova, Z., Thomas, D., Vangala, D., Kwong, R. Y., & Di Carli, M. F. (2009) · JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.04.009 · Cited by 271
Self-citationGupta, A., Taqueti, V. R., van de Hoef, T. P., Bajaj, N. S., Bravo, P. E., Murthy, V. L., Osborne, M. T., Seidelmann, S. B., Vita, T., Bibbo, C. F., et al. (2017) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.117.029992 · Cited by 267
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Di Carli, M. F., Dorbala, S., Meserve, J., El Fakhri, G., Sitek, A., & Moore, S. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Nuclear Medicine
- Publisher
- Society of Nuclear Medicine
- Published
- 2007-05-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 783-793
- ISSN
- 0161-5505 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2125893301
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Myocardial Perfusion PET/CT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2967/jnumed.106.032789
- The paper
- Di Carli, M. F., Dorbala, S., Meserve, J., El Fakhri, G., Sitek, A., & Moore, S. C. (2007). Clinical Myocardial Perfusion PET/CT. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.106.032789
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.