Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 429

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dual-Function Probe for PET and Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging of Tumor Vasculature

Open access
Cai, W., Chen, K., Li, Z.-B., Gambhir, S. S., Chen, X.·2007·Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Abstract

UNLABELLED: To date, the in vivo imaging of quantum dots (QDs) has been mostly qualitative or semiquantitative. The development of a dual-function PET/near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) probe can allow for accurate assessment of the pharmacokinetics and tumor-targeting efficacy of QDs. METHODS: A QD with an amine-functionalized surface was modified with RGD peptides and 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclodocecane-N,N',N'',N'''-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) chelators for integrin alpha(v)beta(3)-targeted PET/NIRF imaging. A cell-binding assay and fluorescence cell staining were performed with U87MG human glioblastoma cells (integrin alpha(v)beta(3)-positive). PET/NIRF imaging, tissue homogenate fluorescence measurement, and immunofluorescence staining were performed with U87MG tumor-bearing mice to quantify the probe uptake in the tumor and major organs. RESULTS: There are about 90 RGD peptides per QD particle, and DOTA-QD-RGD exhibited integrin alpha(v)beta(3)-specific binding in cell cultures. The U87MG tumor uptake of (64)Cu-labeled DOTA-QD was less than 1 percentage injected dose per gram (%ID/g), significantly lower than that of (64)Cu-labeled DOTA-QD-RGD (2.2 +/- 0.3 [mean +/- SD] and 4.0 +/- 1.0 %ID/g at 5 and 18 h after injection, respectively; n = 3). Taking into account all measurements, the liver-, spleen-, and kidney-to-muscle ratios for (64)Cu-labeled DOTA-QD-RGD were about 100:1, 40:1, and 1:1, respectively. On the basis of the PET results, the U87MG tumor-to-muscle ratios for DOTA-QD-RGD and DOTA-QD were about 4:1 and 1:1, respectively. Excellent linear correlation was obtained between the results measured by in vivo PET imaging and those measured by ex vivo NIRF imaging and tissue homogenate fluorescence (r(2) = 0.93). Histologic examination revealed that DOTA-QD-RGD targets primarily the tumor vasculature through an RGD-integrin alpha(v)beta(3) interaction, with little extravasation. CONCLUSION: We quantitatively evaluated the tumor-targeting efficacy of a dual-function QD-based probe with PET and NIRF imaging. This dual-function probe has significantly reduced potential toxicity and overcomes the tissue penetration limitation of optical imaging, allowing for quantitative targeted imaging in deep tissue.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2967/jnumed.107.043216

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Cited by

See all 429

Metadata

Authors
Cai, W., Chen, K., Li, Z.-B., Gambhir, S. S., & Chen, X.
Venue
Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Published
2007-11-01
Volume
48
Issue
11
Pages
1862-1870
ISSN
0161-5505 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2154410581
Cited by
429
References
39
FWCI
25.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dual-Function Probe for PET and Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging of Tumor Vasculature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2967/jnumed.107.043216
The paper
Cai, W., Chen, K., Li, Z.-B., Gambhir, S. S., & Chen, X. (2007). Dual-Function Probe for PET and Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging of Tumor Vasculature. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.107.043216

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.