Cited by 11Avian ecology and behaviorMarine animal studies overviewAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies

Comparison of moult phenology of African penguins Spheniscus demersus at Robben and Dassen islands

Wolfaardt, AC, Underhill, LG, Crawford, RJM·2009·African Journal of Marine Science

Abstract

Dassen and Robben islands are approximately 50 km apart, and currently support the largest and third largest populations of African penguins Spheniscus demersus respectively. At both islands, moult is the most synchronised and seasonal activity of the annual cycle. The main difference in moult phenology between the two islands is the degree of synchronisation. The peak moult period at Dassen Island is broader (less synchronous) than at Robben Island. At both islands, juvenile penguins moulted less synchronously than adults. Juvenile moult was less synchronous at Dassen Island than at Robben Island. Interannual variation in moult phenology was similar at Robben and Dassen islands. Island-level moult phenology was more synchronous in the year following the Treasure spill than was the case after the Apollo Sea spill. This was attributed to the larger number and proportion of birds that were affected by the Treasure spill. The temporal duration of the disruption to moult phenology was also greater following the Treasure spill, especially at Robben Island. Moult counts provide a relatively reliable method of estimating the size of the adult population at Robben Island, but not at Dassen Island where the large number of birds moulting away from the shoreline results in the population size being significantly underestimated. Although the number of active nest sites continued to increase up until 2004 at both islands, the numbers of adult moulters counted declined by 55% between 2003…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2989/ajms.2009.31.1.2.773

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wolfaardt, A., Underhill, L., & Crawford, R.
Venue
African Journal of Marine Science
Published
2009-04
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
19-29
ISSN
  • 1814-232X (ISSN-L)
  • 1814-2338
OpenAlex
W2038986302
Cited by
11
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • African Journal of Marine Science (publishedVersion)
  • Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Earthwatch Institute
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Keywords
African penguin, Spheniscus demersus, moult phenology, interannual variability, oil spills, population size estimation, nest site availability, food availability, Robben Island, Dassen Island

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review