ChatGPT: Educational Artificial Intelligence
Open accessAbstract
On November 30, 2022, OpenAI published ChatGPT, a general-purpose discussion chatbot that is anticipated to have a significant influence on all facets of society. The prospective effects of this NLP tool on education, however, are still unclear. The capacity of ChatGPT may influence adjustments to learning activities, educational learning objectives and assessment and evaluation procedures, which might have a significant impact. In order to create this essay, I piloted ChatGPT as part of a research (see, ChatGPT User Experience: Implications for Education). ChatGPT, according to the pilot study, can help academics write articles that are systematic, coherent, (mostly) right, and instructive. The author's professional experience was used sparingly to complete the article in 2 to 3 hours. I investigate the potential implications of ChatGPT and other similar AI technologies on education in the paper, relying on user experience. The report suggests modifying learning objectives, with an emphasis on enhancing students' creativity and critical thinking rather than broad skill development. Students should be able to employ AI tools to carry out subject-domain activities. Researchers should create AI-based learning projects that involve students in addressing real-world problems in order to meet the learning objectives. Concerns about students contracting out their assessment work are also raised by ChatGPT. The article comes to the conclusion that new evaluation forms are required to emphasise creativity and critical thinking, which AI cannot replace (for details, read the paper).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Concerns have been raised that ChatGPT may disseminate false information and references, reinforce bias, compromise academic integrity, and cause potential decline in students' skills.
“These include the dissemination of false information and references [12, 23, 61, 85], biased reinforcement [47, 50], compromised academic integrity [18, 40, 66, 74], and the potential decline in students' skills [43, 61, 64, 74].”
From A systematic literature review of empirical research on ChatGPT in education (2024) · cites this paper as [61]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
ChatGPT User Experience: Implications for Education
Zhai, X. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4312418 · Cited by 935 · see citing works
Software Design as a Learning Environment
Harel, I., & Papert, S. A. (1990) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/1049482900010102 · Cited by 444 · see citing works
Teaching and Learning with ICT Tools: Issues and Challenges from Teachers’ Perceptions
Ghavifekr, S., Kunjappan, T., Ramasamy, L., & Anthony, A. (2016) · Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.52380/mojet.2016.4.2.81 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Verma, A., Lamsal, K., & Verma, P. (2022) · Industry and Higher Education · doi:10.1177/0950422221990990 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
ChatGPT Usage and LimitationsPreprint
Azaria, A. (2022) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/5ue7n · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence in Intelligent Systems
(2021) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77445-5 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
A Chat with ChatGPT: How will AI impact scholarly publishing?
Lund, B. D. (2022) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.34572.18565/2 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Pask, G. (1976). Conversation theory. Applications in education and epistemology. Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A systematic literature review of empirical research on ChatGPT in education
Albadarin, Y., Saqr, M., Pope, N., & Tukiainen, M. (2024) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-024-00138-2 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
- Venue
- International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering
- Published
- 2023-04-10
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 84-91
- ISSN
- 2278-3091 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4366289305
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 3.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, large language models, artificial intelligence in education, generative AI, academic writing, learning objectives, creativity, critical thinking, assessment and evaluation, academic dishonesty, user experience
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
