The Use of AI in Improving Student's Critical Thinking Skills
Open accessAbstract
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in education has the potential to significantly enhance students' critical thinking skills. This study explores how AI tools can improve critical thinking among students majoring in English Education at X University. Utilizing a mixedmethods approach, the research combines quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews to assess the frequency and contexts of AI usage and its impact on critical thinking. Survey results reveal that 64% of respondents use AI tools several times a week, predominantly in educational settings. A smaller percentage of respondents use AI daily (14%), while another 14% use AI rarely, and 7% use it several times a month. Interviews with frequent AI users indicate that AI assists in expanding ideas and providing deeper insights, but its effectiveness depends on the users' ability to ask precise questions and critically interpret AI-generated content. The findings highlight that while AI can significantly aid in developing critical thinking skills through personalized learning experiences and interactive simulations, challenges such as potential biases and the need for foundational understanding persist. Ultimately, this research underscores the importance of thoughtful and critical use of AI in education to foster improved critical thinking skills.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI can significantly aid in developing critical thinking skills, but its effectiveness depends on the students' thinking abilities.
“Although there are differences in the research focus, this result is similar to the findings of Lawasi et al., (2024), concluding that AI can significantly aid in developing critical thinking skills, but its effectiveness depends on the students' thinking abilities.”
From Facilitator or hindrance? The impact of AI on university students' higher-order thinking skills in complex problem solving (2025) · cites this paper as Lawasi et al., (2024)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Artificial intelligence: A powerful paradigm for scientific research
Xu, Y., Liu, X., Cao, X., Huang, C., Liu, E., Qian, S., Liu, X., Wu, Y., Dong, F., Qiu, C.-W., et al. (2021) · The Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100179 · Cited by 1,726 · cited 1× · see citing works
“AI refers to the simulation of human intelligence by a system or machine to mimic human behaviors ISSN: 2808-103X Proceedings homepage: https://conferenceproceedings.ump.ac.id/pssh/issue/view/34 367 like perceiving, reasoning, learning, planning, predicting, and more (Xu et al., 2021).”
Walter, Y. (2024) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3 · Cited by 1,113 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The argument is also supported by Walter ((2024) who explains that if students do not comply with reading the basic context of a material of a lesson before using AI, then it does not encourage students to criticize the output of the AI results they get.”
ChatGPT for Education and Research: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategies
Rahman, M. M., & Watanobe, Y. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13095783 · Cited by 1,080 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In past years, AI has been recognized by many people and is also used in various fields, one of which is the field of education (Rahman & Watanobe, 2023).”
Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J.-M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., et al. (2023) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence11030054 · Cited by 768 · see citing works
van den Berg, G., & du Plessis, E. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13100998 · Cited by 401 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Berg and Plessis (2023) wrote that AI helps teachers by providing structures, ideas, and resources.”
Mei-juan, J., & Cheng, J. (2020) · Nursing Open · doi:10.1002/nop2.702 · Cited by 94 · cited 1× · see citing works
“It expands learners’ perspectives and fosters their development as proficient and autonomous learners, enhancing learners’ selfdirected learning ISSN: 2808-103X Proceedings homepage: https://conferenceproceedings.ump.ac.id/pssh/issue/view/34 369 competency (Jin & Ji, 2021).”
Developing Critical Thinking in Technical and Vocational Education and Training
López, F., Contreras, M., Nussbaum, M., Paredes, R., Gelerstein, D., Alvares, D., & Chiuminatto, P. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13060590 · Cited by 83 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Lopez et al. (2023) state that critical thinking might divert attention from essential, job-specific competencies that directly impact workforce readiness.”
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Students’ Learning Experience
Kaledio, P., Robert, A., & Frank, L. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4716747 · Cited by 82 · cited 1× · see citing works
“One significant advantage of AI in education is its ability to provide immediate and constructive feedback to students by analyzing vast amounts of data to gain insight into students' strengths, weaknesses, and learning preferences (Kaledio et al., 2024).”
Student Development Zone: Higher Order Thinking Skills (Hots) in Critical Thinking Orientation
Jaenudin, R., Chotimah, U., Farida, F., et al. (2020) · doi:10.18415/ijmmu.v7i9.1884 · Cited by 52 · cited 1×
“According to Bloom’s taxonomy, these skills are classified as High Order Thinking Skills (HOTS), essential for success globalized education landscape (Jaenudin et al., 2020).”
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Higher Education in England
Karimi, H., & Khawaja, S. (2023) · Creative Education · doi:10.4236/ce.2023.1412154 · Cited by 44 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Karimi and Khawaja (2023) stated a refutation that AI cannot help students in critical thinking.”
Cossu, R., Awidi, I. T., & Nagy, J. (2023) · Education for Chemical Engineers · doi:10.1016/j.ece.2023.10.004 · Cited by 20 · cited 1× · see citing works
“It is used in many situations despite the difficulty of defining critical thinking, the elements of critical judgment, reflection interpretation, and justification of decisions seem to be fundamental to it (Cossu et al., 2024).”
Zhao, Y., Liu, Y., & Wu, H. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102306 · Cited by 19 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Critical thinking skills have consistently been acknowledged as a key objective in higher education, representing an indispensable core competency for the 21st century (Zhao et al., 2024).”
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Masadeh, T. S. Y. (2021). EFL teachers critical thinking behaviors and the challenges facing them in classrooms. Journal of English Language Teaching , 10(2).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kassenkhan, A. M., Moldagulova, A. N., & Serbin, V. V. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3576147 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
“Studies by Lawasi et al. [51] and Hong et al. [52] demonstrate that, when used appropriately, AI can stimulate analytical thinking by allowing students to engage in deeper analysis, synthesis, and argumentation.”
Du, X., Du, M., Zhou, Z., & Bai, Y. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-025-00534-0 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Hallucinations in Generative AI: Epistemic Risks for Learners in Educational Applications
Virvou, M. K., Tsihrintzis, G. A., & Tsichrintzi, E.-A. (2025) · International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems & Applications (IISA) · doi:10.1109/iisa66859.2025.11311276 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“Furthermore, scholars highlight the growing importance of critical thinking in the age of generative AI, both as a safeguard against epistemic distortion and as a key learning outcome supported by AI-enhanced instruction [83], [84].”
Legality of Employing Artificial Intelligence for Writing Academic Papers in Education
Kotsis, K. Τ. (2025) · Journal of Contemporary Philosophical and Anthropological Studies · doi:10.59652/jcpas.v3i1.375 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“Though its efficacy depends on students ’ capacity to formulate exact questions and critically evaluate AI-generated content, AI helps in extending ideas and offers deeper insights (Lawasi et al., 2024).”
Xavier, A., Naeem, S. S., Rizwi, W., & Rabha, H. (2025) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/81264 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“In contrast, those with less prior knowledge may use them to fill gaps in their learning or face some difficulties in comprehension [10].”
Bos, N., Lammers, K.-J., & van Leeuwen, A. P. (2025) · Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.37497/rev.artif.intell.educ.v6ii.40 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Zeki, A. M., Tarshany, Y. M. A. R., Wasiq, S., Al-Taei, M. H. A., & Alhazmi, A. K. (2025) · International Conference for Artificial Intelligence, Applications, Innovation and Ethics (AI2E) · doi:10.1109/ai2e64943.2025.10983650 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Moreover, some critics argue that using AI in education could dehumanize the learning experience, where students interact more with machines than with human teachers, resulting in a less engaging and less fulfilling learning experience [28].”
de Nayarit, U. A., Beltrán, J. C. C. C., Ramírez, M. D. C. L., et al. (2025) · doi:10.59899/ges-cono-77-c4 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Initial Validation of the IMPACT Model: Technological Appropriation of ChatGPT by University Faculty
Pereira, L. M., Basantes-Andrade, A., Naranjo-Toro, M., & Guia-Pereira, M. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15111520 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“In fact, the use of AI has been found to significantly enhance critical thinking, particularly when its implementation is oriented toward personalized learning and the critical evaluation of information (Ashraf et al., 2025; Lawasi et al., 2024; Fuchs & Aguilos, 2023; Mastrogiacomi, 2024).”
PERCEIVED IMPACT OF AI-ASSISTED LEARNING ON CRITICAL THINKING: EVIDENCE FROM CHINESE ENGLISH MAJORS
Li, Z., & Ganapathy, M. N. G. (2026) · International Journal of Modern Education · doi:10.35631/ijmoe.829026 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Amilhasad, A. (2025) · Journal of Education and Academic Settings · doi:10.62596/94mas632
Socio-emotional Determinants of Students’ Attitude to Artificial Intelligence
Kolek, A. (2024) · The New Educational Review · doi:10.15804/tner.2024.si.5.10
Dr.Ajiith Xavier, F., Naeem, S. S., rizwi, P. W., & rabha, H. (2025) · doi:10.2196/preprints.81264
Santos, R. S. D., Jr., & Tulud, D. M. (2025) · Journal of Basic Education Research · doi:10.37251/jber.v6i3.1823
“This corresponds with the claim of Lawasi et al. [51], who highlighted that AI can help students broaden their ideas, deepen their understanding, and verify the accuracy and relevance of the information.”
InfluentialDigital Art History Pedagogy: Prompt Engineering
Hutson, J. (2025) · Springer series on cultural computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-02920-1_6 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
The Loss of Deep Reading and Critical Thinking in Education
Kamal, Z., & Abbas, R. K. (2025) · Curriculum and Teaching · doi:10.7459/ct/400208
A Bibliometric Analysis of Thinking Skills Research: Trends and Patterns from 1980 to 2025
Talu, A. A. (2026) · Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.17556/erziefd.1764106
Ravelo, V. M., Ancho, I., Mecha, J. P. F., & Albakri, I. S. M. A. (2026) · The Palawan Scientist · doi:10.69721/tps.j.2026.18.1.20
Palaganas, J. C., Morton, A., Adem, F., Ramos, J., Kumar, A. A., Jawed, K., & Bajwa, M. (2026) · Cureus Journal of Computer Science. · doi:10.7759/s44389-026-00094-y
Does AI Dependency Hinder or Enhance Critical Thinking? Examining the Role of Self-Regulation
Buntaran, F. A. A., Irmawan, D., & Sabir, A. (2026) · Bulletin of Counseling and Psychotherapy · doi:10.51214/002026081616000
“Lawasi et al. (2024) found that AI can significantly support the development of critical thinking through personalized learning experiences and interactive simulations; however, challenges remain, such as potential biases and the need for a strong foundational understanding.”
Asghar, M. Z., Fabusoye, O. A., & Özbilen, F. M. (2026) · Discover Computing · doi:10.1007/s10791-026-10313-8
AI and critical thinking: cognitive partner or cognitive substitute
Liyanage, N. G. L. S. J., & Nawastheen, F. M. (2026) · Muallim Journal of Social Science and Humanities · doi:10.33306/mjssh/425
Yusriani, Y., & Yuyung, A. (2026) · ETDC Indonesian Journal of Research and Educational Review · doi:10.51574/ijrer.v5i4.5010
“When positioned as a source of adaptive feedback, AI appears to function as a form of cognitive scaffolding— prompting students to evaluate information, weigh alternative perspectives, and construct arguments more systematically (Lawasi et al., 2024; Hong et al., 2025; Vildósola et al., 2025).”
“What’s the Tea?” Teaching Students the Art of Asking the Right Questions
Dirige-Benauro, C. M. (2026) · Management Teaching Review · doi:10.1177/23792981261465907
Developing Critical AI Literacy for Ethical Educational Practice
Almutairy, G. F. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-7837-4.ch007
A Correlational Study on AI Tool Usage and Critical Thinking Skills of College Students
Ferrer, B. E. P., Abad, M. I., Artates, A. G. F., Forbes, H. E., Nayga, M. T., & Bangga, D. (2026) · International Conference on Distance Education and Learning (ICDEL) · doi:10.1109/icdel70250.2026.11663799
“Similarly, it was observed that AI use could help students expand ideas, gain deeper insights, and verify information accuracy, which aligns with the present study’s observation that students who used AI more frequently were comparatively better at evaluating and reflecting on information [26].”
Qu, J., Dai, L., & Yin, M. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0356183
“LLMs can reduce the burden of information gathering and broaden accessible perspectives, potentially allowing learners to allocate more effort to evaluation and reflection [29,30].”
خضير, أ. م. م. ا. (2026) · Al-Adab Journal · doi:10.31973/xegrat32
- Authors
- Lawasi, M. C., Rohman, V. A., & Shoreamanis, M.
- Affiliations
- Pelita Harapan University (ID)
- Venue
- Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities
- Published
- 2024-09-23
- Volume
- 18
- Pages
- 366-370
- ISSN
- 2808-103X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4402838991
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 10.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in education, critical thinking skills, English education students, personalized learning, interactive simulation, algorithmic bias, university students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review