Cited by 5Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health Treatment and Access

Investigating Medical Cost and Mortality Among Psychiatric Patients Involuntary Admissions: A Nationwide Propensity Score-Matched Study

Open access
Tseng, Pei-Ying, Xie, Xin-Yu, Hsu, Ching-Chi, Chien, Sarina Hui-Lin, Chen, Jen-De, Wang, Jong-Yi·2022·Psychiatry Investigation

Abstract

Objective Involuntary admission to psychiatric inpatient care can protect both patients with severe mental illnesses and individuals around them. This study analyzed annual healthcare costs per person for involuntary psychiatric admission and examined categories of mental disorders and other factors associated with mortality.Methods This retrospective cohort study collected 1 million randomly sampled beneficiaries from the National Health Insurance Database for 2002–2013. It identified and matched 181 patients with involuntary psychiatric admissions (research group) with 724 patients with voluntary psychiatric admissions (control group) through 1:4 propensity-score matching for sex, age, comorbidities, mental disorder category, and index year of diagnosis.Results Mean life expectancy of patients with involuntary psychiatric admissions was 33.13 years less than the general population. Average annual healthcare costs per person for involuntary psychiatric admissions were 3.94 times higher compared with voluntary admissions. The general linear model demonstrated that average annual medical costs per person per compulsory hospitalization were 5.8 times that of voluntary hospitalization. Survival analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model found no significant association between type of psychiatric admission (involuntary or voluntary) and death.Conclusion This study revealed no significant difference in mortality between involuntary and voluntary psychiatric admissions, indicating involuntary treatment’s effectiveness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.30773/pi.2021.0219

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One meta-analysis of inpatient suicide reported an 87% increased risk of suicide among people admitted involuntarily.

    “This is in line with one meta-analysis of inpatient suicide, which reported an 87% increased risk of suicide among people admitted involuntarily (127).”

    From The benefits and harms of inpatient involuntary psychiatric treatment: a scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [127]

    The Methods (Research design; page unavailable) describe a propensity score-matched study, not a meta-analysis. The Introduction mentions suicide during hospitalization, but neither it nor the Results reports an 87% increase in suicide risk for involuntarily admitted patients. Searches for the percentage and for a meta-analysis of inpatient suicide found no such passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [23]Lee MC Investigating the mortality and health care costs for patients with mental disorders in Taiwan [Master’s Thesis] Taichung China Medical University 2017

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tseng, P.-Y., Xie, X.-Y., Hsu, C.-C., Chien, S. H.-L., Chen, J.-D., & Wang, J.-Y.
Affiliations
  • China Medical University (TW)
  • Kuang Tien General Hospital (TW)
  • National Changhua University of Education (TW)
Corresponding author
Wang, Jong-Yi
Venue
Psychiatry Investigation
Published
2022-07-25
Volume
19
Issue
7
Pages
527-537
ISSN
  • 1738-3684 (ISSN-L)
  • 1976-3026
OpenAlex
W4286485307
Cited by
5
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry Investigation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST109-2410-H-039-001, MOST110-2410-H-039-001)
  • China Medical University (CMU108-MF-103, CMU109-MF-119, CMU110-MF-123)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
involuntary psychiatric admission, health care costs, mortality, severe mental illness, compulsory hospitalization, mental illness, life expectancy, psychiatric inpatient care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review