The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Instructional Goal Structure: Cooperative, Competitive, or Individualistic
Abstract
Theories of instruction are prescriptive, in the sense that they set forth rules concerning or specifying the most effective way of achieving knowledge or mastering skills. Although there has been a great deal of debate concerning various aspects of the instructional situation, most educators seem to assume that there are no operational alternatives to the competitive goal structure in which students are expected to outperform their peers. There has been little recognition of the powerful effects the goal structure has upon student behavior, and the relevant social psychological research has never been fully reviewed. There are four possible goal structures which can be implemented in a learning situation: competitive, cooperative, individualistic, and no structure. Each type of goal structure has an implicit value foundation which is taught subtly, as an unconscious curriculum, to the student who interacts within it. There is a great deal of evidence that the process by which students learn (i.e., the way in which students interact and behave in learning situations) and the outcomes of learning are both largely determined by the goal structure implemented by educators. The purpose of this article is to present a review of the research on the use of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on learning processes and outcomes. Before beginning the review the authors wish to make their bias clear. We believe that cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures are all appropriate and effective under different conditions, that educators should use all three goal structures depending upon the specific instructional objectives, and that students should be taught the basic skills necessary to function in all three types of situations. There are some difficulties, however, with presenting a complete view of the conditions under which each type of goal structure should be used. There is little research comparing individualistic goal structures with cooperative and competitive goal structures and, therefore, the research on cooperation and competition dominates the review. Although there is a great deal of research comparing cooperative and competitive goal structures, this research has not clearly specified the conditions under which each is desirable. Much of the current literature on educational
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation.
Deci, E. L. (1971) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0030644 · Cited by 4,170
Deutsch, M. (1958) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/002200275800200401 · Cited by 2,077
Effects of Facilitative Role Interdependence on Group Functioning
Thomas, E. J. (1957) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675701000404 · Cited by 167
Interdependence, Differential Rewarding, and Productivity
Miller, L. K., & Hamblin, R. L. (1963) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089914 · Cited by 167
Cited by
An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x09339057 · Cited by 2,721
Self-citationJohnson, D. W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R., Nelson, D., & Skon, L. (1981) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.89.1.47 · Cited by 1,588
Self-citationAcademic Emotions and Student Engagement
Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2012) · Handbook of Research on Student Engagement · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_12 · Cited by 1,181
The State of Cooperative Learning in Postsecondary and Professional Settings
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. (2007) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9038-8 · Cited by 853
Self-citationRoseth, C. J., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.223 · Cited by 837
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T.
- Venue
- Review of Educational Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1974
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 213
- ISSN
- 0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2136826859
- Cited by
- 548
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 15.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Instructional Goal Structure: Cooperative, Competitive, or Individualistic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/1170165
- The paper
- Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1974). Instructional Goal Structure: Cooperative, Competitive, or Individualistic. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170165
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.