The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Synthesis of Research on Language of Reading Instruction for English Language Learners
Abstract
This article reviews experimental studies comparing bilingual and English-only reading programs for English language learners. The review method is best-evidence synthesis, which uses a systematic literature search, quantification of outcomes as effect sizes, and extensive discussion of individual studies that meet inclusion standards. A total of 17 studies met the inclusion standards. Among 13 studies focusing on elementary reading for Spanish-dominant students, 9 favored bilingual approaches on English reading measures, and 4 found no differences, for a median effect size of +0.45. Weighted by sample size, an effect size of +0.33 was computed, which is significantly different from zero (p < .05). One of two studies of heritage languages (French and Choctaw) and two secondary studies favored bilingual approaches. The review concludes that although the number of high-quality studies is small, existing evidence favors bilingual approaches, especially paired bilingual strategies that teach reading in the native language and English at different times each day. However, further research using longitudinal, randomized designs is needed to determine how best to ensure reading success for all English language learners.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cross-language transfer of phonological awareness.
Durgunoğlu, A. Y., Nagy, W. E., & Hancin-Bhatt, B. J. (1993) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.453 · Cited by 772
Cited by
The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis
(2019) · doi:10.7758/9781610448864 · Cited by 4,553
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the cognitive correlates of bilingualism
Adesope, O. O., Lavin, T., Thompson, T., & Ungerleider, C. (2010) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654310368803 · Cited by 1,132
Effective Programs in Elementary Mathematics: A Best-Evidence Synthesis
Slavin, R. E., & Lake, C. (2008) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654308317473 · Cited by 407
Self-citationAlisaari, J., Heikkola, L. M., Commins, N., & Acquah, E. O. (2019) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2019.01.003 · Cited by 264
Downer, J. T., López, M. L., Grimm, K. J., Hamagami, A., Pianta, R. C., & Howes, C. (2012) · Early Childhood Research Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.07.005 · Cited by 180
Palmer, D. (2011) · International Multilingual Research Journal · doi:10.1080/19313152.2011.594019 · Cited by 123
Cole (2014) · doi:10.1177/1086296x14552179 · Cited by 57
Bilingual Education in the United States
Gándara, P., & Escamilla, K. (2017) · Bilingual and Multilingual Education · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02258-1_33 · Cited by 55
Linklater, D. L., O'Connor, R. E., & Palardy, G. J. (2009) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2009.08.001 · Cited by 40
Spanish instruction in head start and dual language learners’ academic achievement
Miller, E. B. (2017) · Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2017.07.008 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Slavin, R. E., & Cheung, A.
- Venue
- Review of Educational Research
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 247-284
- ISSN
- 0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-1046
- OpenAlex
- W2168139411
- Cited by
- 485
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 49.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.