Cited by 390Career Development and DiversityScience Education and PerceptionsEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 109 of the 109 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Developing a STEM Identity Among Young Women: A Social Identity Perspective

Kim, Ann Y., Sinatra, Gale M., Seyranian, Viviane·2018·Review of Educational Research

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review of empirical research focused on the experiences of female students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) during middle and high school. Drawing on social identity theory, recent research was synthesized to explore how aspects of the social environment influence STEM identity development. Findings indicate that young women experience challenges to their participation and inclusion when they are in STEM settings. Additionally, we found that perceptions regarding who is part of the ingroup or outgroup of STEM fields can be changed through intervention and educational programs. We conclude with recommendations for theory, research, programs, and policy for STEM identity development among young women, informed by a social identity perspective.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/0034654318779957

Cites

109 of 109 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 108 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. 10.1177/016146811511700308 · DOI
  2. Brown P. L., Concannon J. P., Marx D., Donaldson C. W., Black A. (2016). An examination of middle school students’ STEM self-efficacy with relation to interest and perceptions of STEM. Journal of STEM Education, 17(3), 27–38.
  3. Hammer D., Goldberg F., Fargason S. (2012). Responsive teaching and the beginnings of energy in a third grade classroom. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 6(1), 51–72.
  4. Hegewisch A., Ellis E., Hartmann H. (2015). The gender wage gap: 2015; Earnings differences by race and ethnicity. Washington, DC: Institute for Women’s Policy Research.
  5. 10.1016/S0065-2601(06)39002-8 · DOI · Paper page
  6. *Naizer G., Hawthorne M. J., Henley T. B. (2014). Narrowing the gender gap: Enduring changes in middle school students’ attitude toward math, science and technology. Journal of STEM Education, 15, 29–34.
  7. 10.18574/nyu/9780814762776.001.0001 · DOI
  8. Sahin A. (2013). STEM clubs and science fair competitions: Effects on post-secondary matriculation. Journal of STEM Education, 14(1), 5–11.
  9. Turner J. C. (1991). Social influence. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 390

Metadata

Authors
Kim, A. Y., Sinatra, G. M., & Seyranian, V.
Affiliations
  • California State University, Long Beach (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • California State Polytechnic University (US)
Venue
Review of Educational Research
Published
2018-06-04
Volume
88
Issue
4
Pages
589-625
ISSN
  • 0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-1046
OpenAlex
W2806576596
Cited by
390
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 4
FWCI
45.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Review of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Science Education and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
STEM identity, young women, social identity theory, gender and STEM, middle and high school students, intervention program, STEM participation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review