Cited by 78

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Missing Manual: Using National Student Clearinghouse Data to Track Postsecondary Outcomes

Dynarski, Susan M., Hemelt, Steven W., Hyman, Joshua M.·2015·Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis

Abstract

This article explores the promises and pitfalls of using National Student Clearinghouse (NSC) data to measure a variety of postsecondary outcomes. We first describe the history of the NSC, the basic structure of its data, and recent research interest in using NSC data. Second, using information from the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), we calculate enrollment coverage rates for NSC data over time, by state, institution type, and demographic student subgroups. We find that coverage is highest among public institutions and lowest (but growing) among for-profit colleges. Across students, enrollment coverage is lower for minorities but similar for males and females. We also explore two potentially less salient sources of non-coverage: suppressed student records due to privacy laws and matching errors due to typographic inaccuracies in student names. To illustrate how this collection of measurement errors may affect estimates of the levels and gaps in postsecondary attendance and persistence, we perform several case-study analyses using administrative transcript data from Michigan public colleges. We close with a discussion of practical issues for program evaluators using NSC data.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/0162373715576078

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Ackerman D., 2011, Paper presented at National Tax Association Conference
  2. 10.1093/qje/qjs017 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/S1573-4412(01)05012-7 · DOI
  4. Chingos M. M., 2012, The effect of school vouchers on college enrollment: Experimental evidence from New York City
  5. Cunningham A. F., 2005, Feasibility of a student unit record system within the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System
  6. 10.1257/aer.104.3.991 · DOI
  7. Garcia T., 2012, Strong foundations: The state of state postsecondary data systems: 2012 update on data sharing with K-12 and labor
  8. Goldrick-Rab S., Harris D. N., Kelchen R., Benson J. (2012). Need-based financial aid and college persistence experimental evidence from Wisconsin. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1887826
  9. 10.3102/0162373713493131 · DOI
  10. Hout M., 2011, Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 179
  11. 10.3386/w9703 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/0034-6527.00329 · DOI · Paper page
  13. National Center for Education Statistics, 1990, Digest of education statistics
  14. National Center for Education Statistics, 2010, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS)
  15. 10.3386/w19053 · DOI
  16. 10.1257/jep.25.1.159 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Wooldridge J. M., 2003, Introductory econometrics

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dynarski, S. M., Hemelt, S. W., & Hyman, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • University of Connecticut
Venue
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
Published
2015-05
Volume
37
Issue
1_suppl
Pages
53S-79S
ISSN
  • 0162-3737
  • 1935-1062
Cited by
78
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review