Cited by 76Reading and Literacy DevelopmentLiteracy and Educational PracticesEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

Dialogue-Intensive Pedagogies for Promoting Reading Comprehension: What We Know, What We Need to Know

Wilkinson, Ian A. G., Murphy, P. Karen, Binici, Sevda·2015·Socializing Intelligence Through Academic Talk and Dialogue

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/978-0-935302-43-1_3

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dialogue-based instruction has been widely viewed as effective for teaching and learning.

    “Dialogue-based instruction has been widely viewed as effective for teaching and learning (Wilkinson, Murphy, and Binici 2015).”

    From The Impact of a Dialogic Intervention on a Chinese Rural Teacher and Students' Stances Towards Texts (2025) · cites this paper as Wilkinson, Murphy, and Binici 2015

  • Approaches with an efferent stance can lead to teachers controlling the turn-taking and limit opportunities for students to have multiple text interpretations.

    “researchers have argued that approaches with an efferent stance can lead to teachers controlling the turn-taking (Wilkinson, Murphy, and Binici 2015) and limit opportunities for students to have multiple text interpretations (Soter et al. 2008).”

    From The Impact of a Dialogic Intervention on a Chinese Rural Teacher and Students' Stances Towards Texts (2025) · cites this paper as Wilkinson, Murphy, and Binici 2015

  • Student stance on discussion of texts is associated with particular instructional decisions.

    “It has been posited that student stance on discussion of texts is associated with particular instructional decisions (Wilkinson, Murphy, and Binici 2015).”

    From The Impact of a Dialogic Intervention on a Chinese Rural Teacher and Students' Stances Towards Texts (2025) · cites this paper as Wilkinson, Murphy, and Binici 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilkinson, I. A. G., Murphy, P. K., & Binici, S.
Venue
Socializing Intelligence Through Academic Talk and Dialogue
Published
2015-04
Pages
37-50
OpenAlex
W2545279465
Cited by
76
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4
FWCI
9.72
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Keywords
reading comprehension, classroom discourse, reading instruction, teacher-student dialogue

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review