Cited by 34Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsTryptophan and brain disordersNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Investigation of the optimal dose for experimental lipopolysaccharide-induced recognition memory impairment: behavioral and histological studies

Open access
Alzahrani, Noor Ahmed, Bahaidrah, Khulud Abdullah, Mansouri, Rasha Abdulrashed, Alsufiani, Hadeil Muhanna, Alghamdi, Badrah Saeed·2022·Journal of Integrative Neuroscience

Abstract

Background: Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) administration is one of the most commonly used methods for inducing inflammation in animal models. Several animal studies have investigated the effects of acute and chronic peripheral administration of LPS on cognitive impairment. However, no previous study has compared the effects of different doses of chronically administered LPS on recognition memory performance. Aim: Here, we aimed to investigate the optimal dose of chronically administered LPS for the induction of recognition memory impairment in mice. Materials and methods: LPS at different doses (0.25, 0.50 and 0.75 mg/kg) was administered to SWR/J mice daily for 7 days. On day 9, the open field, novel object recognition and novel arm discrimination behavioral tests were performed. Additionally, prefrontal cortical histological examination was conducted. Results: Compared with the control group, mice injected with 0.75 mg/kg LPS notably showed no object preference (familiar vs. novel), a reduction in the discrimination index, and spatial recognition impairment. Administration of the 0.25 and 0.50 mg/kg doses of LPS showed a preference for the novel object compared with the familiar object, had no significant impact on the discrimination index, and caused spatial recognition impairment. These behavioral results are in line with the histological examination of the prefrontal cortex, which revealed that the 0.75 mg/kg dose produced the most histological damage. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that for chronic peripheral administration of LPS, 0.75 mg/kg is the optimal dose for inducing neuroinflammation-associated recognition memory deficits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31083/j.jin2102049

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Kempuraj D, Thangavel R, Natteru PA, Selvakumar GP, Saeed D, Zahoor H, et al. Neuroinflammation Induces Neurodegener- ation. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Spine. 2016; 1: 1003.
  2. Jin X, Yamashita T. Microglia in central nervous system repair after injury. Journal of Biochemistry. 2016; 159: 491-496.
  3. Huang X, Hussain B, Chang J. Peripheral inflammation and blood-brain barrier disruption: effects and mechanisms. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics. 2021; 27: 36-47.
  4. Huang C, Irwin MG, Wong GTC, Chang RCC. Evidence of the impact of systemic inflammation on neuroinflammation from a non-bacterial endotoxin animal model. Journal of Neuroinflam- mation. 2018; 15: 147.
  5. Muthuraju S, Zakaria R, Karuppan MKM, Al-Rahbi B. The Role of Neuroinflammation in Cellular Damage in Neurodegen- erative Diseases. BioMed Research International. 2020; 2020: 9231452.
  6. Murray C, Sanderson DJ, Barkus C, Deacon RMJ, Rawlins JNP, Bannerman DM, et al. Systemic inflammation induces acute working memory deficits in the primed brain: relevance for delirium. Neurobiology of Aging. 2012; 33: 603-616.e3.
  7. Frühauf PKS, Porto Ineu R, Tomazi L, Duarte T, Mello CF, Ru- bin MA. Spermine reverses lipopolysaccharide-induced mem- ory deficit in mice. Journal of Neuroinflammation. 2015; 12: 3.
  8. Tyrtyshnaia A, Bondar A, Konovalova S, Sultanov R, Manzhulo I. N-Docosahexanoylethanolamine Reduces Microglial Activa- tion and Improves Hippocampal Plasticity in a Murine Model of Neuroinflammation. International Journal of Molecular Sci- ences. 2020; 21: 9703.
  9. Barker GRI, Bird F, Alexander V, Warburton EC. Recognition memory for objects, place, and temporal order: a disconnection analysis of the role of the medial prefrontal cortex and perirhinal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2007; 27: 2948-2957.
  10. Xiang JZ, Brown MW. Differential neuronal encoding of nov- elty, familiarity and recency in regions of the anterior temporal lobe. Neuropharmacology. 1998; 37: 657-676.
  11. Wagner AD, Desmond JE, Glover GH, Gabrieli JD. Prefrontal cortex and recognition memory. Functional-MRI evidence for context-dependent retrieval processes. Brain. 1998; 121: 1985- 2002.
  12. Duarte A, Ranganath C, Knight RT. Effects of unilateral pre- frontal lesions on familiarity, recollection, and source memory. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2005; 25: 8333-8337.
  13. Euston DR, Gruber AJ, McNaughton BL. The role of medial pre- frontal cortex in memory and decision making. Neuron. 2012; 76: 1057-1070.
  14. Zuberi A, Lutz C. Mouse Models for Drug Discovery. Can New Tools and Technology Improve Translational Power? ILAR Journal. 2016; 57: 178-185.
  15. Zhao J, Bi W, Xiao S, Lan X, Cheng X, Zhang J, et al. Neu- roinflammation induced by lipopolysaccharide causes cognitive impairment in mice. Scientific Reports. 2019; 9: 5790.
  16. Batista C, Gomes GF, Candelario-Jalil E, Fiebich BL, de Oliveira A. Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Neuroinflammation as a Bridge to Understand Neurodegeneration. International Jour- nal of Molecular Sciences. 2019; 20: 2293.
  17. Catorce MN, Gevorkian G. LPS-induced Murine Neuroinflam- mation Model: Main Features and Suitability for Pre-clinical Assessment of Nutraceuticals. Current Neuropharmacology. 2016; 14: 155-164.
  18. Lee JW, Lee YK, Yuk DY, Choi DY, Ban SB, Oh KW, et al. Neuro-inflammation induced by lipopolysaccharide causes cog- nitive impairment through enhancement of beta-amyloid gener- ation. Journal of Neuroinflammation. 2008; 5: 37.
  19. De Luca SN, Soch A, Sominsky L, Nguyen T, Bosakhar A, Spencer SJ. Glial remodeling enhances short-term memory per- formance in Wistar rats. Journal of Neuroinflammation. 2020; 17: 52.
  20. Czerniawski J, Miyashita T, Lewandowski G, Guzowski JF. Systemic lipopolysaccharide administration impairs retrieval of context-object discrimination, but not spatial, memory: Evidence for selective disruption of specific hippocampus- dependent memory functions during acute neuroinflammation. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. 2015; 44: 159-166.
  21. Salmani H, Hosseini M, Baghcheghi Y, Moradi-Marjaneh R, Mokhtari-Zaer A. Losartan modulates brain inflammation and improves mood disorders and memory impairment induced by innate immune activation: The role of PPAR-gamma activation. Cytokine. 2020; 125: 154860.
  22. Heisler JM, O'Connor JC. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase- dependent neurotoxic kynurenine metabolism mediates inflammation-induced deficit in recognition memory. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. 2015; 50: 115-124.
  23. Ramírez K, Quesada-Yamasaki D, Fornaguera-Trías J. A Proto- col to Perform Systemic Lipopolysacharide (LPS) Challenge in Rats. Odovtos -International Journal of Dental Sciences. 2019; 21: 53-66.
  24. Borikar SP, Dongare SI, Danao KR. Reversal of lipopolysaccharide-induced learning and memory deficits by agmatine in mice. The International Journal of Neuro- science. 2021; 1-12. (in press)
  25. Guzman-Martinez L, Maccioni RB, Andrade V, Navarrete LP, Pastor MG, Ramos-Escobar N. Neuroinflammation as a Com- mon Feature of Neurodegenerative Disorders. Frontiers in Phar- macology. 2019; 10: 1008.
  26. Saito T, Saido TC. Neuroinflammation in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease. Clinical & Experimental Neuroimmunol- ogy. 2018; 9: 211-218.
  27. Nazem A, Sankowski R, Bacher M, Al-Abed Y. Rodent models of neuroinflammation for Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Neu- roinflammation. 2015; 12: 74.
  28. Katafuchi T, Ifuku M, Mawatari S, Noda M, Miake K, Sugiyama M, et al. Effects of plasmalogens on systemic lipopolysaccharide-induced glial activation and β-amyloid ac- cumulation in adult mice. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2012; 1262: 85-92.
  29. Bossù P, Cutuli D, Palladino I, Caporali P, Angelucci F, Laric- chiuta D, et al. A single intraperitoneal injection of endotoxin in rats induces long-lasting modifications in behavior and brain protein levels of TNF-α and IL-18. Journal of Neuroinflamma- tion. 2012; 9: 101.
  30. Sorrenti V, Contarini G, Sut S, Dall'Acqua S, Confortin F, Pagetta A, et al. Curcumin Prevents Acute Neuroinflamma- tion and Long-Term Memory Impairment Induced by Systemic Lipopolysaccharide in Mice. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2018; 9: 183.
  31. Biederman I. Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review. 1987; 94: 115- 147.
  32. Szczepanski SM, Knight RT. Insights into human behavior from lesions to the prefrontal cortex. Neuron. 2014; 83: 1002-1018.
  33. Alghamdi BS, AboTaleb HA. Melatonin improves mem- ory defects in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis by up-regulating cAMP-response element-binding protein and synapse-associated proteins in the prefrontal cortex. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience. 2020; 19: 229-237.
  34. Pezze MA, Marshall HJ, Fone KC, Cassaday HJ. Role of the anterior cingulate cortex in the retrieval of novel object recogni- tion memory after a long delay. Learning & Memory. 2017; 24: 310-317.
  35. Reid JM, Jacklin DL, Winters BD. Delineating prefrontal cor- tex region contributions to crossmodal object recognition in rats. Cerebral Cortex. 2014; 24: 2108-2119.
  36. Jamali-Raeufy N, Kardgar S, Baluchnejadmojarad T, Roghani M, Goudarzi M. Troxerutin exerts neuroprotection against lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induced oxidative stress and neuroin- flammation through targeting SIRT1/SIRT3 signaling pathway. Metabolic Brain Disease. 2019; 34: 1505-1513.
  37. Tan W, Zhang Q, Dong Z, Yan Y, Fu Y, Liu X, et al. Phos- phatidylcholine Ameliorates LPS-Induced Systemic Inflamma- tion and Cognitive Impairments via Mediating the Gut-Brain Axis Balance. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2020; 68: 14884-14895.
  38. Feng X, Hu H, Chen J, Long C, Yang L, Wang L. Acute neu- roinflammation increases excitability of prefrontal parvalbumin interneurons and their functional recruitment during novel object recognition. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. 2021; 98: 48-58.
  39. Chen Z, Jalabi W, Shpargel KB, Farabaugh KT, Dutta R, Yin X, et al. Lipopolysaccharide-induced microglial activation and neuroprotection against experimental brain injury is independent of hematogenous TLR4. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2012; 32: 11706-11715.
  40. Wang D, Liu Y, Zhao Y, Zhou J. Low dose of lipopolysaccharide pretreatment can alleviate the in? Ammatory response in wound infection mouse model. Chinese Journal of Traumatology. 2016; 19: 193-198.
  41. Sarnyai Z, Sibille EL, Pavlides C, Fenster RJ, McEwen BS, Toth M. Impaired hippocampal-dependent learning and func- tional abnormalities in the hippocampus in mice lacking sero- tonin (1a) receptors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2000; 97: 14731- 14736.
  42. Wang JH, Ma YY, van den Buuse M. Improved spatial recog- nition memory in mice lacking adenosine a2a receptors. Exper- imental Neurology. 2006; 199: 438-445.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alzahrani, N. A., Bahaidrah, K. A., Mansouri, R. A., Alsufiani, H. M., & Alghamdi, B. S.
Affiliations
King Abdulaziz University (SA)
Corresponding author
Alzahrani, Noor Ahmed
Venue
Journal of Integrative Neuroscience
Publisher
IMR Press
Published
2022-03-21
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
49-49
ISSN
  • 0219-6352 (ISSN-L)
  • 1757-448X
OpenAlex
W4220661307
Cited by
34
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Integrative Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
lipopolysaccharide, dose optimization, recognition memory impairment, neuroinflammation, novel object recognition, spatial recognition, cognitive impairment, mouse model
MeSH terms
Animals, Inflammation, Lipopolysaccharides, Memory Disorders, Recognition, Psychology, Mice, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review