Cited by 48Innovations in Medical EducationEvaluation of Teaching PracticesSimulation-Based Education in Healthcare

Twelve tips for using the objective structured teaching exercise for faculty development

Boillat, Miriam, Bethune, Cheri, Ohle, Elizabeth, Razack, Saleem, Steinert, Yvonne·2012·Medical Teacher

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The importance of faculty development to improve clinicians' teaching skills has been well articulated in the literature. There are few objective measures of the impact of faculty development on teaching skills. The objective structured teaching exercise (OSTE) is a faculty development tool that may meet this challenge. It also has great potential to be used in the development and enhancement of teaching skills. The OSTE consists of a simulated teaching scenario involving a standardized learner with objective and immediate feedback given to the teacher, and includes a pre-determined behaviourally based scale or checklist to assess teaching performance. AIM: There is little information in the literature on the practical aspects of how to develop and deliver an OSTE in a faculty development context. Based on our experience, we created a framework to guide the use of the OSTE for faculty development. METHODS: Twelve tips for using the OSTE for faculty development are outlined in this article. These include: clarifying the goal and target audience, identifying what teaching skills to focus on, developing the scenario and the assessment tool, choosing and training the standardized learner, holding a dry run, protecting the teacher, integrating the OSTE into one's own context and promoting buy-in, and evaluating the activity. CONCLUSIONS: The OSTE is a novel tool to enhance faculty development. We describe 12 key elements that are important for its successful development and delivery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/0142159x.2011.599891

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boillat, M., Bethune, C., Ohle, E., Razack, S., & Steinert, Y.
Affiliations
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
Corresponding author
Boillat, Miriam
Venue
Medical Teacher
Published
2012-03-28
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
269-273
ISSN
  • 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-187X
OpenAlex
W2109876208
Cited by
48
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Teacher (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Keywords
faculty development, teaching skills assessment, simulation-based assessment, teacher feedback, medical education, implementation framework
MeSH terms
Educational Measurement, Faculty, Medical, Goals, Humans, Peer Group, Staff Development, Teaching, Clinical Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review