The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intra-Osseous Anchorage of Dental Prostheses:I. Experimental Studies
Abstract
An investigation of factors controlling healing and long term stability of intra-osseous titanium implants to restore masticatory function in dogs revealed that an integrity of the good anchorage of the implant requires: (1) Non-traumatic surgical preparation of soft and hard tissues and a mechanically and chemically clean implant. (2) Primary closure of the mucoperiosteal flap, to isolate the implant site from the oral cavity until a biological barrier has been reestablished. (3) Oral hygiene to prevent gingival inflammation. Provided these precautions are taken, it is possible to subject dental prostheses, connected to the implants, to unlimited masticatory load. With these precautions such implants were found to tolerate ordinary use in dogs for periods of more than 5 years without signs of tissue injury or other indications of rejection phenomena.Macroscopic clinical investigation, stereomicroscopy, roentgenography and light microscopy of the implant site in situ and after removal from the body showed that the soft and hard tissues had accepted the implant and incorporated it without producing signs of tissue injury. In fact the bone appeared to grow into all the minute pits and impressions in the surface of the titanium implant, without any shielding layer of buffer tissue at all.These findings indicate that dental prostheses can be successfully anchored intra-osseously in the dog suggesting that its possible clinical use in oral rehabilitation should be given unprejudiced consideration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Impact of Dental Implant Surface Modifications on Osseointegration
Smeets, R., Stadlinger, B., Schwarz, F., Beck-Broichsitter, B., Jung, O., Precht, C., Kloss, F., Gröbe, A., Heiland, M., & Ebker, T. (2016) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2016/6285620 · Cited by 701
Hermann, J. S., Cochran, D. L., Nummikoski, P. V., & Buser, D. (1997) · Journal of Periodontology · doi:10.1902/jop.1997.68.11.1117 · Cited by 678
Bosshardt, D. D., Chappuis, V., & Buser, D. (2017) · Periodontology 2000 · doi:10.1111/prd.12179 · Cited by 574
Nano-scale modification of titanium implant surfaces to enhance osseointegration
Souza, J. C. M., Sordi, M. B., Kanazawa, M., Ravindran, S., Henriques, B., Silva, F. S., Aparicio, C., & Cooper, L. F. (2019) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.045 · Cited by 544
Schenk, R. K., & Buser, D. (1998) · Periodontology 2000 · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0757.1998.tb00120.x · Cited by 300
Metadata
- Authors
- Brånemark, P.-I., Breine, U., Adell, R., Hansson, B. O., Lindström, J., & Ohlsson, Å.
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1969-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 81-100
- ISSN
- 0036-5556 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2056773589
- Cited by
- 1,811
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intra-Osseous Anchorage of Dental Prostheses:I. Experimental Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/02844316909036699
- The paper
- Brånemark, P.-I., Breine, U., Adell, R., Hansson, B. O., Lindström, J., & Ohlsson, Å. (1969). Intra-Osseous Anchorage of Dental Prostheses:I. Experimental Studies. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844316909036699
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.