Cited by 78Tendon Structure and TreatmentElbow and Forearm Trauma TreatmentMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

A randomized controlled trial of exercise versus wait-list in chronic tennis elbow (lateral epicondylosis)

Open access
Peterson, Magnus, Butler, Stephen, Eriksson, Margaretha, Svärdsudd, Kurt·2011·Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic tennis elbow (lateral epicondylosis) is a common disorder. Like other chronic soft-tissue pain conditions it is often difficult to treat successfully. The effects of exercise have been discussed, but no convincing evidence has been put forward so far, and a simple protocol for exercise is lacking. AIMS OF THE STUDY: This study is a randomized, controlled, clinical trial of the effect of exercise versus expectation (wait-list) on pain, muscle strength, function, and quality of life in patients with long-standing lateral epicondylosis. METHODS: Eighty-one subjects with tennis elbow lasting for more than 3 months were randomly allocated to an exercise group (n = 40) or a reference group (n = 41). The exercise group performed daily exercise, with weekly load increase, for 3 months. The reference group was wait-listed, but otherwise followed in the same way. Outcome measures were pain during maximum voluntary muscle contraction (Cozen's test) and pain during maximum muscle elongation with a load (modified Empty-can-test); muscle strength was measured with a Chatillon MSE 100 hand-held dynamometer, and the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and the Gothenburg Quality of Life questionnaires. RESULTS: The exercise group had greater and faster regression of pain, both during muscle contraction and muscle elongation, than the reference group (p = 0.0005 and p = 0.0016, respectively). There was a non-significant muscle strength difference between the groups, but no differences regarding DASH scores or quality of life measures. CONCLUSIONS: Exercise appears to be superior to expectation in reducing pain in chronic lateral epicondylosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/03009734.2011.600476

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Disability levels at the end of the program (12.56, 95% CI 10.25; 14.87) were within the ranges reported in previous studies (9-23 points).

    “Disability levels at the end of this program (12.56, 95% CI 10.25; 14.87) were within the ranges reported in previous studies (9–23 points), using either QuickDASH, DASH or the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation questionnaire (PRTEE) [74,75,78,79].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [1]Verhaar JA Tennis elbow [PhD thesis] The Netherlands Maastricht University 1992
  2. [46]Alkner B Effects of unloading and resistance exercise on skeletal muscle function, size and composition in man [PhD thesis] Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Section for Muscle and Exercise Physiology, Karolinska Institute 2005 Stockholm, Sweden

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peterson, M., Butler, S., Eriksson, M., & Svärdsudd, K.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Uppsala University Hospital (SE)
Venue
Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences
Published
2011-11
Volume
116
Issue
4
Pages
269-279
ISSN
  • 0300-9734 (ISSN-L)
  • 2000-1967
OpenAlex
W2087338752
Cited by
78
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Vetenskapsrådet (K2005-27X-15293-01A)
  • Uppsala Universitet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Tendon Structure and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
lateral epicondylitis, exercise therapy, waitlist control, analgesia, muscle strength, functional disability, quality of life, empty can test, hand dynamometry, DASH questionnaire
MeSH terms
Adult, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain Measurement, Tennis Elbow, Exercise, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review