Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 288

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reference Values for Lung Function Tests in Men: Regression Equations with Smoking Variables

Open access
Hedenström, Hans, Malmberg, Per, Fridriksson, Hrafn V.·1986·Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences

Abstract

Prediction formulas for static and dynamic spirometry, gas distribution, static lung mechanics and the transfer test were derived from measurements in healthy men. The measurements included total lung capacity, residual volume, airways resistance, static elastic recoil pressure of the lung, static compliance, closing volume, slope of the alveolar plateau (phase III), flow-volume variables (including mean transit time) during breathing of air or a helium/oxygen mixture, and conventional spirometric indices. The results from 146 smokers and 124 never-smokers were evaluated separately and combined. For all lung function tests a single regression equation was obtained. The prediction formulas included time-related smoking variables and were valid for both smokers and never-smokers. For many lung function tests, a nonlinear age coefficient resulted in a significant reduction in variance compared with simple linear models. Heavy tobacco smoking influenced most lung function tests less than ageing from 20 to 70 years, but for airways resistance, transfer factor and phase III the opposite was found.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/03009738609178670

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1963.tb16521.x · doi:10.1111/j.0954-6820.1963.tb16521.x
  2. Buist A. S., 1973, Am Rev Dis, 107, 744
  3. Buist A. S., 1973, Am Rev Resp Dis, 108, 1078
  4. Fridriksson H. V., 1981, Clinical physiology, 1, 343, 10.1111/j.1475-097X.1981.tb00903.x · doi:10.1111/j.1475-097x.1981.tb00903.x
  5. Hedenström H., 1985, Accepted for publication in Clin Resp Phys
  6. Khosla T., 1967, Brit J Prev Soc Med, 22, 122
  7. Knudson R. J., 1977, Am Rev Resp Dis, 115, 423
  8. Knudson R. J., 1983, Am Rev Resp Dis, 127, 725
  9. Milic-Emili J., 1964, J Appl Physiol, 19, 20
  10. Nie N. H., 1975, SPSS, Statistical package for the social sciences. 2nd ed.
  11. Permutt S., 1979, Lung biology in Health and Disease, vol 12: The lung in the transition between health and disease, 113
  12. Quanjer Ph. H, 1983, Clin Resp Phys suppl 5, 19
  13. Salorinne Y, 1976, Scand J Resp Dis suppl, 9
  14. Sixt R., 1964, Eur J Resp Dis, 65, 296
  15. Van Ganse W. F., 1972, Am Rev Resp Dis, 105, 30
  16. Viljanen A. A., 1981, Scand J Clin Lab Invest, 41, 5
  17. Viljanen A. A., 1981, Scand J clin Lab Invest, 41, 21
  18. Viljanen A. A., 1981, Scand J Clin Lab Invest, 41, 35
  19. Woitowitz H-J., 1967, Prax Pneumol, 21, 449

Cited by

See all 288

Metadata

Authors
Hedenström, H., Malmberg, P., & Fridriksson, H. V.
Venue
Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences
Published
1986-01
Volume
91
Issue
3
Pages
299-310
ISSN
  • 0300-9734 (ISSN-L)
  • 2000-1967
OpenAlex
W2059235669
Cited by
288
References
15
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reference Values for Lung Function Tests in Men: Regression Equations with Smoking Variables. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/03009738609178670
The paper
Hedenström, H., Malmberg, P., & Fridriksson, H. V. (1986). Reference Values for Lung Function Tests in Men: Regression Equations with Smoking Variables. Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3109/03009738609178670

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.