Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 514

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Astaxanthin from Microbial Sources

Johnson, Eric A., An, Gil-Hwan·1991·Critical Reviews in Biotechnology

Abstract

Salmon farming increased substantially in the 1980s, which created a large market for astaxanthin, the principal pigment of salmon. Carotenoids are the most widely distributed class of pigments in nature and have essential biological functions in animals. They also impart attractive pigmentation to many farmed animals. Since animals lack the ability to synthesize carotenoids, the pigments must be supplemented to feeds, usually at considerable expense to the farmer (10 to 15% of total feed costs). Astaxanthin (3,3′-dihydroxy-β,SbT-carotene-4,4′-dione) is the principal carotenoid pigment of salmonids and gives attractive pigmentation in the eggs, flesh, and skin. Worldwide production of farmraised salmon increased rapidly in the past decade, and more than 200,000 T were raised in 1990. Currently, chemically synthesized astaxanthin and canthaxanthin (β,β-carotene4,4′-dione) are added to salmonid feeds as pigmenters, but there is considerable interest within the aquaculture industry in using natural sources of astaxanthin. The principal biological sources being considered are Crustacea and crustacean extracts, the green microalga Haematococcus, and the yeast Phaffia rhodozyma. Each natural pigment source has its limitations and they currently cannot compete economically with the synthetic additive. Crustacean meals have relatively low contents of astaxanthin and high levels of moisture, ash, and chitin. The alga Haematococcus has a high concentration of astaxanthin (0.2 to 2%), but industrial application is limited by the lengthy autotrophic cultivation in open freshwater ponds and the requirement for disruption of the cell wall to liberate the carotenoid. The yeast P. rhodozyma has desirable properties as a biological source of pigment, including rapid heterotrophic metabolism and production of high cell densities in fermentors, but its content of astaxanthin in wild strains is only 200 to 300 μg/g yeast (0.02 to 0.03%). Mutants have been isolated that produce >3000 μg total carotenoid per gram of yeast (>0.30%) in shake flasks after 5 d growth, and measurement of carotenoid fluorescence in individual cells indicates that levels of 10,000 to 15,000 μg/g can be obtained. Highproducers, however, are often unstable and further strain development is required. In this article, biological sources of astaxanthin are critically evaluated and compared with the synthetic compound presently being used in animal feeds.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/07388559109040622

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 514

Metadata

Authors
Johnson, E. A., & An, G.-H.
Venue
Critical Reviews in Biotechnology
Published
1991-01
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
297-326
ISSN
  • 0738-8551 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-7801
OpenAlex
W2119985163
Cited by
514
References
1
FWCI
5.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Astaxanthin from Microbial Sources. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/07388559109040622
The paper
Johnson, E. A., & An, G.-H. (1991). Astaxanthin from Microbial Sources. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.3109/07388559109040622

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.