CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 136Cardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionCardiac Health and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effectiveness of individual lifestyle interventions in reducing cardiovascular disease and risk factors

Open access
Ketola, Eeva, Sipilä, Raija, Mäkelä, Marjukka·2000·Annals of Medicine
DOI 10.3109/07853890009011767
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

In order to assess the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions in reducing cardiovascular disease risk factors, morbidity and mortality among working-age adults, we undertook a systematic review of randomized controlled trials of various lifestyle interventions (diet, exercise, smoking cessation, alcohol intake reduction) in adults followed for 1 year or longer. Twenty-one single-factor and 21 multifactorial interventions were analysed by outcome. Changes in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and total mortality were considered as main outcomes. Changes in weight, total cholesterol, blood pressure, sodium excretion, smoking and alcohol consumption were also analysed, and numbers needed to treat were calculated for smoking, morbidity and mortality. In secondary prevention, both single and multifactorial lifestyle interventions were shown to reduce morbidity and mortality, and multifactorial approaches reduced cholesterol levels. Primary prevention was found to reduce risk factors efficiently, especially when the intervention is multifactorial. Effect sizes were heterogeneous with wide confidence intervals. Standardized ways of describing interventions, measuring their effects and reporting outcomes systematically would facilitate effect-size evaluations. Interventions should optimally be multifactorial and targeted at high-risk patients with multiple risk factors for cardiovascular disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/07853890009011767

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 99 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Silagy C, 1998, The Cochrane Library, Issue 2
  2. Beilin L J, 1994, J Hypertens, 12, S71
  3. Ebrahim S, 1999, The Cochrane Library, Issue 3
  4. Guyatt G H, 1993, JAMA, 270, 2598, 10.1001/jama.1993.03510210084032 · DOI
  5. Strandberg T E, 1995, Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis, 5, 7
  6. Carson P, 1982, J R Coll Physicians Lond, 16, 147
  7. 1968, Lancet, 2, 693
  8. Niebauer J, 1996, Am J Cardiol, 78, 163, 10.1016/S0002-9149(96)00251-2 · DOI
  9. 1986, Lancet, 869
  10. Baron J A, 1990, Br J Gen Pract, 40, 137
  11. Stamler R, 1989, JAMA, 262, 1801, 10.1001/jama.1989.03430130077038 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–136 of 136

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ketola, E., Sipilä, R., & Mäkelä, M.
Corresponding author
Ketola, Eeva
ORCID
Venue
Annals of Medicine
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2000-01
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
239-251
ISSN
  • 0785-3890 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2060
DOI
10.3109/07853890009011767
OpenAlex
W2142524048
Cited by
135
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
lifestyle intervention, cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular risk factors, multifactorial intervention, diet, physical activity, smoking cessation, alcohol consumption reduction, secondary prevention, primary prevention, cardiovascular morbidity, cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, cholesterol, blood pressure, sodium excretion, weight, number needed to treat, working-age adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Alcohol Drinking, Blood Pressure, Body Weight, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cholesterol, Diet, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Prevention, Risk Factors, Smoking, Sodium, Health Behavior, Exercise, Survival Rate, Confidence Intervals, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Smoking Cessation, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review