Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 449

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differences in Lipolysis between Human Subcutaneous and Omental Adipose Tissues

Arner, Peter·1995·Annals of Medicine

Abstract

Hydrolysis of triglycerides to fatty acids and glycerol in fat cells (lipolysis) is of importance for the control of lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. This process is regulated by several hormones and parahormones acting on cyclic AMP formation or breakdown, which in turn influences the activity of hormone sensitive lipase. The latter enzyme stimulates hydrolysis of triglycerides in fat cells. It is well established through in vivo and in vitro investigations that there are regional variations in the lipolytic activity of human adipose tissue. The rate of lipolysis is low in the subcutaneous femoral/gluteal region, intermediate in the subcutaneous abdominal region and high in the visceral (i.e. omental) region. In non-obese subjects the differences between the subcutaneous and visceral fat depots may be explained by site variations in the function of receptors for insulin, catecholamines and adenosine. The lipolytic beta 1 and beta 2 adrenoceptors, as well as the newly discovered beta 3, are most active in the visceral fat cells. The antilipolytic insulin receptors, alpha 2 adrenoceptors and adenosine receptors are most active in the subcutaneous fat cells. In subjects with upper-body obesity the regional variations in the action of catecholamines on lipolysis are further enhanced. Decreased action of beta 2-adrenergic receptors and increased activity of alpha 2-adrenergic adrenoceptors in combination with defects in hormone sensitive lipase function inhibits the lipolytic effect of catecholamines in subcutaneous fat cells whereas increased activity of beta 3-adrenergic receptors and decreased activity of alpha 2 adrenoceptors augment the lipolytic response in visceral fat cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/07853899509002451

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 449

Metadata

Authors
Arner, P.
Venue
Annals of Medicine
Published
1995-08-01
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
435-438
ISSN
0785-3890 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1968390752
Cited by
449
References
3
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differences in Lipolysis between Human Subcutaneous and Omental Adipose Tissues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/07853899509002451
The paper
Arner, P. (1995). Differences in Lipolysis between Human Subcutaneous and Omental Adipose Tissues. Annals of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.3109/07853899509002451

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.