Cited by 30Dermatological diseases and infestationsDermatology and Skin DiseasesParasitic Diseases Research and Treatment

Efficacy, acceptability and cost effectiveness of four therapeutic agents for treatment of scabies.

Abdel-Raheem, Talal A., Méabed, Eman M. H., Nasef, Ghada A., Abdel Wahed, Wafaa Y., Rohaim, Rania M. A.·2016·Journal of Dermatological Treatment

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate four drug regimens for treatment of scabies as regard their efficacy, acceptability and cost effectiveness. Two hundred cases with ordinary scabies were randomized into four groups. First group received ivermectin 200 μg/kg body weight single oral dose, repeated after one week. The second received benzyl benzoate 20% cream. The third received permethrin 2.5%-5% lotion, whereas the fourth group received 5-10% sulfur ointment. Topical treatments were applied for five consecutive nights. Patients were followed up for two weeks for cure rate and adverse effects. At the end of the study, permethrin provided a significant efficacy of 88% and acceptability in 100% of cases, but had higher cost to treat one case (20.25 LE). Ivermectin provided efficacy and acceptability rates of 84% and 96%, respectively, and had a cheaper cost (9.5 LE). Benzyl benzoate provided 80% for both rates and was the cheapest drug. Sulfur ointment provided the least rates, and it was the most expensive. Treatment choice will depend on the age, the general condition of cases, patient compliance to topical treatment and his ability to stick to its roles, and the economic condition of the patient.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/09546634.2016.1151855

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Topical permethrin and oral and topical ivermectin have similar efficacy for cure of scabies.

    “Topical permethrin and oral and topical ivermectin have similar efficacy for cure of scabies (1405–1410).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [1406]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abdel-Raheem, T. A., Méabed, E. M. H., Nasef, G. A., Abdel Wahed, W. Y., & Rohaim, R. M. A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Dermatology, STDs and Andrology, Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt;
  • Fayoum University (EG)
  • Department of Dermatology, STDs and Andrology, Faculty of Medicine, El-Menia University, El-Menia, Egypt;
  • Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt;
  • Ministry of Health and Population (EG)
Corresponding author
Méabed, Eman M. H.
Venue
Journal of Dermatological Treatment
Published
2016-03-30
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
473-479
ISSN
  • 0954-6634 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-1753
OpenAlex
W2331757043
Cited by
30
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Dermatological Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Dermatological diseases and infestations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
Keywords
scabies, scabies treatment, ivermectin, benzyl benzoate, permethrin, sulfur ointment, treatment efficacy, treatment acceptability, cost-effectiveness, cure rate, adverse effects
MeSH terms
Adult, Benzoates, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Female, Humans, Insecticides, Ivermectin, Male, Middle Aged, Scabies, Sulfur, Patient Satisfaction, Permethrin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review