Cited by 132Mental Health and Patient InvolvementPsychiatric care and mental health servicesHistorical Psychiatry and Medical Practices

The mainstreaming of recovery

Open access
Rose, Diana·2014·Journal of Mental Health

Abstract

Recovery is everywhere. I am not the first person to say it was invented by the service user/survivor movement (Deegan, 1988) and subsequently taken up by mental health professionals (Repper & Perk...

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/09638237.2014.928406

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There has been criticism about personal recovery being defined in individualistic terms that neglect collectivist values more present in some cultural groups.

    “There has, however, been criticism about personal recovery being defined in individualistic terms (16) that neglect collectivist values that are more present in some cultural groups (17–20).”
  • There has been substantive criticism about the field of recovery being excessively focused on the individual has raised awareness on the risk of glossing over important social challenges and the stressful social conditions that can be generated by high expectations of self-control in adverse contexts.

    “There has been substantive criticism about the field of recovery being excessively focused on the individual has raised awareness on the risk of glossing over important social challenges and the stressful social conditions that can be generated by high expectations of self-control in adverse contexts (18, 97–99).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Slade M. (2009). Personal Recovery and Mental Illness: A Guide for Mental Health Professionals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rose, D.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Rose, Diana
Venue
Journal of Mental Health
Published
2014-07-02
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
217-218
ISSN
  • 0963-8237 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0567
OpenAlex
W2010067595
Cited by
132
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
Keywords
recovery, mainstreaming, mental health professionals, mental health services, recovery-oriented care
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Mental Health, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review