Cited by 421Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryMedical Practices and RehabilitationCancer survivorship and care

Self-efficacy and self-management after stroke: a systematic review

Jones, Fiona, Riazi, Afsane·2011·Disability and Rehabilitation

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this review is to examine (1) the influence of self-efficacy on rehabilitation outcomes post-stroke, and (2) the evidence to support self-management interventions based on self-efficacy principals for stroke survivors. METHOD: Medline, Embase, Psychlit, Web of Science, AMED and Cochrane Databases for systematic reviews databases were searched for relevant articles in English between 2000 and ending in July 2009. Articles included (1) primary research testing relationships between self-efficacy and rehabilitation outcomes including the measuring impairment and activity or participation in a stroke population, and (2) research testing efficacy and effectiveness of self-management interventions designed specifically for a stoke population in which the principle theoretical framework is self-efficacy or a similar control cognition. Methodological quality appraisal and data extraction was carried out by two reviewers. RESULTS: Of the 104 articles that were identified by the search, 22 met the criteria to be included in the review. There is evidence that self-efficacy is an important variable associated with various outcomes post-stroke. These outcomes include quality of life or perceived health status, depression, ADL and, to a certain extent, physical functioning. Further empirical evidence is needed to extend these findings, and to determine whether self-efficacy has additional predictive value over and beyond the objective measures of impairment. There is also emerging evidence of benefits to be gained from programmes that target self-management based on self-efficacy principles; however, the optimal format of delivering these interventions for stroke survivors is not clear. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need for researchers, to work together with other stakeholders to develop and test interventions that can support self-management skills and confidence to make continued progress after stroke. This could help to reduce some of the negative consequences of stroke such as reduced quality of life and social isolation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/09638288.2010.511415

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, F., & Riazi, A.
Affiliations
  • St George's, University of London (GB)
  • Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Jones, Fiona
Venue
Disability and Rehabilitation
Published
2010-08-27
Volume
33
Issue
10
Pages
797-810
ISSN
  • 0963-8288 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5165
OpenAlex
W2111301792
Cited by
421
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 15
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Disability and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Repository (Kingston University London) (submittedVersion)
  • Royal Holloway Digital Repository (Royal Holloway University of London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
self-efficacy, stroke, self-management interventions, stroke rehabilitation, stroke survivors, quality of life, depression, activities of daily living, physical function, social isolation
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Activities of Daily Living, Health Services Research, Humans, Self Care, Treatment Outcome, Self Efficacy, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review