Cited by 57Multiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsEthics in Clinical ResearchStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials

Differences between unselected patients and participants in multiple myeloma clinical trials in US: a threat to external validity

Costa, Luciano J., Hari, Parameswaran N., Kumar, Shaji K.·2016·Leukemia & Lymphoma

Abstract

External validity of clinical trials is affected by dissimilarities between study subjects and patient population. We identified 128 manuscripts (8,869 subjects) published between 2007 and 2014 reporting results of multiple myeloma (MM) trials performed entirely in the US. Characteristics of subjects were compared with unselected patients from SEER-18. Median of median age of subjects was 61 years vs. median age of unselected patients of 69 years. Trial subjects with untreated MM had less advanced stage than unselected patients. Racial-ethnic composition was informed in only 51 (39.8%) trials. Industry-sponsored trials were more likely to report accrual of minorities than National Cancer Institute (NCI) or investigator-sponsored trials. The observed/expected minority accrual was 0.52 (95% CI 0.49-0.55), being lower (0.43) in investigator-sponsored and higher (0.61) in industry-sponsored trials. We concluded that minorities, older individuals and persons with more advanced disease are underrepresented in MM trials, potentially compromising external validity of results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/10428194.2016.1170828

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Costa, L. J., Hari, P. N., & Kumar, S. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Costa, Luciano J.
Venue
Leukemia & Lymphoma
Published
2016-04-22
Volume
57
Issue
12
Pages
2827-2832
ISSN
  • 1026-8022 (ISSN-L)
  • 1042-8194
  • 1029-2403
OpenAlex
W2341043824
Cited by
57
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2
FWCI
5.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Leukemia & lymphoma/Leukemia and lymphoma (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (UG1HL138641)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Keywords
multiple myeloma, underrepresentation of minorities, elderly patients, disease stage, industry-sponsored trials, SEER, patient accrual
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Clinical Trials as Topic, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Myeloma, Sex Factors, United States, Reproducibility of Results, SEER Program, Patient Selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review