Cited by 66Genetic Associations and EpidemiologySchizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health Research Topics

A New Role for Endophenotypes in the GWAS Era: Functional Characterization of Risk Variants

Open access
Hall, Mei-Hua·2010·Harvard Review of Psychiatry

Abstract

Editor 1From Harvard Medical School (Drs. Hall and Smoller); Psychology Research Laboratory, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA (Dr. Hall); Psychiatric Genetics Program in Mood and Anxiety Disorders, Department of Psychiatry and Center for Human Genetic Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (Dr. Smoller). Supported, in part, by the National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression (NARSAD) Sidney R. Baer, Jr. Foundation Young Investigator Award and NIMH grant no. 2T32MH016259-29A1 (Dr. Hall); NIMH grant nos. MH079799 and MH085542 (Dr. Smoller). *Correspondence: Mei-Hua Hall, PhD, Harvard Medical School, Psychology Research Laboratory, McLean Hospital, 115 Mill St., Belmont, MA 02478. E-mail:[email protected] Original manuscript received 25 March 2009; accepted 8 June 2009 Original manuscript received 18 June 2009

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/10673220903523532

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using quantitative endophenotypes as the primary endpoint for GWAS instead of a binary classification of presence/absence of disease enables a more precise phenotype measurement, thus increasing the power for identification of genetic variants associated with disease.

    “Using quantitative endophenotypes as the primary endpoint for GWAS instead of a binary classification of presence/absence of disease enables a more precise phenotype measurement, thus increasing the power for identification of genetic variants associated with disease [207]”

    From Genetic architecture of Alzheimer's disease (2020) · cites this paper as [207]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hall, M.-H.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Hall, Mei-Hua
Venue
Harvard Review of Psychiatry
Published
2010-01
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
67-74
ISSN
1067-3229 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081091104
Cited by
66
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Harvard Review of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH079799, MH-079799, MH085542, K01MH086714, R01MH085542, T32MH016259)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
endophenotypes, genome-wide association study, psychiatric genetics, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, mood disorders, anxiety disorders, genetic susceptibility
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Phenotype, Risk Factors, Genetic Variation, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review