Cited by 126Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentSchizophrenia research and treatmentGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Cognitive function in unaffected twins discordant for affective disorder

CHRISTENSEN, MAJ VINBERG, KYVIK, KIRSTEN OHM, KESSING, LARS VEDEL·2006·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background. Patients may present with cognitive impairment in the euthymic phase of affective disorder, but it is unclear whether the impairment is prevalent before onset of the illness. The aim of the present study was to examine the hypothesis that genetic liability to affective disorder is associated with cognitive impairment. Method. In a cross-sectional high-risk case–control study, healthy monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins with (High-Risk twins) and without (the control group/Low-Risk twins) a co-twin history of affective disorder were identified through nationwide registers. Cognitive performance of 203 High-Risk and Low-Risk twins was compared. Results. Healthy twins discordant for unipolar disorder showed lower performance on almost all measures of cognitive function: selective and sustained attention, executive function, language processing and working and declarative memory, and also after adjustment for demographic variables, subclinical symptoms and minor psychopathology. Healthy twins discordant for bipolar disorder showed lower performance on tests measuring episodic and working memory, also after adjustment for the above-mentioned covariables. The discrete cognitive impairment found seemed to be related to genetic liability, as the MZ High-Risk twins showed significant impairment on selective and sustained attention, executive function, language processing and working and declarative memory, whereas the DZ High-Risk twins presented with significantly lower scores only on language processing and episodic memory. Conclusions. The hypothesis that discrete cognitive impairment is present before the onset of the affective disorder and is genetically transmitted was supported. Thus, cognitive function may be a candidate endophenotype for affective disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291706007896

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CHRISTENSEN, M. V., KYVIK, K. O., & KESSING, L. V.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
  • Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2006-05-31
Volume
36
Issue
8
Pages
1119-1129
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2131328754
Cited by
125
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
FWCI
6.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Lundbeckfonden
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
cognitive impairment, mood disorders, monozygotic twins, dizygotic twins, genetic susceptibility, endophenotypes, unipolar disorder, bipolar disorder, attention, executive function, memory, language processing
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Bipolar Disorder, Cognition Disorders, Denmark, Depressive Disorder, Diseases in Twins, Female, Humans, Individuality, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Phenotype, Psychometrics, Risk, Twins, Dizygotic, Twins, Monozygotic, Genetic Predisposition to Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review