Cited by 38Schizophrenia research and treatmentBipolar Disorder and TreatmentMental Health and Psychiatry

Antipsychotic prophylaxis is needed after remission from a first psychotic episode in schizophrenia patients: results from an aborted randomised trial

Boonstra, Geartsje, Burger, Huibert, Grobbee, Diederick E, Kahn, René S·2011·International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of withdrawal of antipsychotic treatment on relapse risk in remitted first-episode schizophrenia patients. METHODS: First-episode 1-year stable and remitted outpatients with a schizophrenic disorder were randomly allocated to continuation of their antipsychotic regimen for at least 6 months (N = 9), or gradual withdrawal (N = 11). Primary outcome was the difference in cumulative relapse-free survival at 9 months. RESULTS: Recruitment was terminated prematurely on 26 October 2005. The cumulative relapse-free survival was 88% (SE = 0.12) in the continuation and 18% (SE = 0.12) in the discontinuation group (P = 0.001) at 9 months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Discontinuation of antipsychotic medication markedly increases the risk of relapse in stable remitted first-episode schizophrenia patients. In future studies the topics of safety monitoring and sampling of patients should receive extra attention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/13651501.2010.534801

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is likely that discontinuation studies employing linear dose reductions will be more likely to induce withdrawal reactions (including, potentially, withdrawal psychosis) because reductions in D2 antagonism become increasingly large, causing greater likelihood of dopaminergic rebound.

    “It is, therefore, likely that discontinuation studies employing linear dose reductions,74,83,84,86,87 as recommended in some older guidelines,94 will be more likely to induce withdrawal reactions (including, potentially, withdrawal psychosis) because reductions in D2 antagonism become increasingly large, causing greater likelihood of dopaminergic rebound.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boonstra, G., Burger, H., Grobbee, D. E., & Kahn, R. S.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Boonstra, Geartsje
Venue
International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice
Published
2010-11-30
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
128-134
ISSN
  • 1365-1501 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-1788
OpenAlex
W2096205994
Cited by
38
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Eli Lilly and Company
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
antipsychotic prophylaxis, antipsychotic withdrawal, first-episode schizophrenia, remission, relapse risk, relapse-free survival, drug discontinuation
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Schizophrenia, Antipsychotic Agents, Disease-Free Survival, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review