Cited by 3Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentSchizophrenia research and treatmentPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Symptoms and treatment of bipolar patients in Sweden

Adler, Mats, Backlund, Lena, Edman, Gunnar, Ösby, Urban·2012·International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to investigate affective symptoms and pharmacological treatment in bipolar I disorder patients, and to test whether self-rated symptoms could predict hospital admissions during a 12-month follow-up period. METHODS: A total of 231 outpatients with clinical bipolar I disorder were recruited. The clinical diagnoses were reassessed by a semi-structured interview. Twenty-four patients (10%) was reclassified as bipolar disorder type II or schizoaffective disorder (bipolar type). Medication status was recorded and symptoms were assessed with the self-rating scale AS-18. Patients were prospectively followed for 12 months and hospitalizations during that time were recorded. RESULTS: More than half (60%) rated themselves as normothymic. Mixed affective symptoms were more common than either depressive or manic/hypomanic symptoms. The admission rate during 1 year of follow-up was 13% (95% C.I. 8-17%). Patients which at baseline rated themselves high in either mania or in depression had a significantly increased risk for hospitalization (OR = 3.15; 95% C.I. 1.38-7.19). CONCLUSIONS: The findings should encourage clinicians to use patient self ratings in order to identify patients with a high risk for hospitalization for targeted interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/13651501.2011.653377

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Adler, M., Backlund, L., Edman, G., & Ösby, U.
Affiliations
Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Adler, Mats
Venue
International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice
Published
2012-03-21
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
170-177
ISSN
  • 1365-1501 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-1788
OpenAlex
W2139725019
Cited by
3
References
28
Citations by year
2013: 3
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • AstraZeneca
  • Sanofi
  • Stockholms Läns Landsting
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
bipolar I disorder, affective symptoms, self-reported symptoms, hospitalization risk, manic symptoms, depressive symptoms, bipolar II disorder, schizoaffective disorder, antipsychotic drugs, outpatients, risk prediction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affective Symptoms, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antidepressive Agents, Bipolar Disorder, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Recurrence, Sweden, Logistic Models, Antimanic Agents, Principal Component Analysis, Young Adult, Self Report, Suicidal Ideation, Diagnostic Self Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review