Biofilm production and evaluation of antifungal susceptibility amongst clinical Candida spp. isolates, including strains of the Candida parapsilosis complex
Open accessAbstract
Candida cells can form biofilms that frequently are sources of infections and are less susceptible to antifungal drugs. Some authors have reported that Candida orthopsilosis and Candida metapsilosis isolates are not able to produce biofilms in vitro and there are no studies available on biofilm susceptibility for these species to antifungals. The aims of this study were to (i) quantify Candida spp. biofilms in vitro, and (ii) test the in vitro susceptibilities of Candida spp. biofilms to fluconazole (FLC) and amphotericin B (AMB). Isolates studied included four Candida albicans, six C. tropicalis, seven C. parapsilosis, eight C. orthopsilosis, and five C. metapsilosis. We compared two different methods to evaluate biofilm production, i.e., crystal violet (CV) staining and XTT-reduction assays (XTT). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to observe high, medium and low biofilm producing isolates screened by these two methods. To determine the minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) for FLC and AMB, XTT-reduction assay was used to measure cell metabolic activity. Biofilm quantification by CV and XTT showed that C. tropicalis isolates were the highest biofilm producer, followed by C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, C. orthopsilosis and C. metapsilosis. Examination of SEM images revealed that the extent of biofilms formed by high, medium, and low producers was highly correlated to the results generated by CV assay. Biofilm of all the isolates evaluated were resistant to FLC (MBEC(80) ≥ 256 ug/ml) but, in general, susceptible to AMB, except for six C. parapsilosis strains (MBEC(80) ≥ 8 ug/ml).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MBECs in biofilm conditions were assessed by the XTT reduction assay as previously described, with minor modifications.
“MBECs in biofilm conditions were assessed by the tetrazolium salt (XTT) reduction assay as previously described (66, 67), with minor modifications.”
From Ume6-dependent pathways of morphogenesis and biofilm formation in <i>Candida auris</i> (2024) · cites this paper as [66]
Cites
Wisplinghoff, H., Bischoff, T., Tallent, S. M., Seifert, H., Wenzel, R. P., & Edmond, M. B. (2004) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/421946 · Cited by 4,496 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Role of matrix β-1,3 glucan in antifungal resistance of non-albicans Candida biofilms
Mitchell, K. F., Taff, H. T., Cuevas, M. A., Reinicke, E. L., Sanchez, H., & Andes, D. R. (2013) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.02378-12 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Conserved and Divergent Roles of Bcr1 and CFEM Proteins in Candida parapsilosis and Candida albicans
Ding, C., Vidanes, G. M., Maguire, S. L., Guida, A., Synnott, J. M., Andes, D. R., & Butler, G. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028151 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
The role of antifungals against Candida biofilm in catheter-related candidemia
Bouza, E., Guinea, J., & Guembe, M. (2014) · Antibiotics · doi:10.3390/antibiotics4010001 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Antifungal potential of eugenyl acetate against clinical isolates of Candida species
Musthafa, K. S., Hmoteh, J., Thamjarungwong, B., & Voravuthikunchai, S. P. (2016) · Microbial Pathogenesis · doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2016.07.012 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Figueiredo-Carvalho, M. H. G., Ramos, L. D. S., Barbedo, L. S., Chaves, A. L. D. S., Muramoto, I. A., Santos, A. L. S. D., Almeida-Paes, R., & Zancopé-Oliveira, R. M. (2016) · Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz · doi:10.1590/0074-02760150376 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Ume6-dependent pathways of morphogenesis and biofilm formation in <i>Candida auris</i>
Louvet, M., Li, J., Brandalise, D., Bachmann, D., Sala de Oyanguren, F., Labes, D., Jacquier, N., Genoud, C., Mucciolo, A., Coste, A. T., et al. (2024) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/spectrum.01531-24 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Melo, A. S., Bizerra, F. C., Freymüller, E., Arthington-Skaggs, B. A., & Colombo, A. L.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Colombo, Arnaldo L.
- Venue
- Medical Mycology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 253-262
- ISSN
- 0268-1218 (ISSN-L)
- 1369-3786
- 1460-2709
- OpenAlex
- W2048732946
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 5.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Medical Mycology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (05/50778-1)
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Keywords
- Candida biofilms, antifungal susceptibility, Candida parapsilosis complex, Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis, Candida orthopsilosis, Candida metapsilosis, fluconazole resistance, amphotericin B susceptibility, minimum biofilm eradication concentration, crystal violet staining, biofilm quantification
- MeSH terms
- Amphotericin B, Antifungal Agents, Candida, Gentian Violet, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Staining and Labeling, Tetrazolium Salts, Fluconazole, Biofilms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review