Cited by 73Neonatal skin health careInfant Development and Preterm CarePediatric Pain Management Techniques

Iatrogenic skin injury in the neonatal intensive care unit

Sardesai, Smeeta R., Kornacka, Maria K., Walas, Wojciech, Ramanathan, Rangasamy·2011·The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine

Abstract

Although neonatal care has become more and more meticulous with significant changes in technology in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) in the past 50 years, iatrogenic cutaneous injuries continue to occur. Although the incidence of severe injuries is decreasing because the more difficult procedures are being replaced by improved techniques, skin injuries have not yet been completely eliminated. However, the nature and causes of cutaneous injuries have changed, and the injuries are frequent but generally minor. The major risk factors are low birth weight, gestational age, length of stay, a central venous line, mechanical ventilation, and support with continuous positive airway pressure. The rate of iatrogenic events is about 57% at gestational ages of 24-27 weeks, compared with 3% at term. There are no current comprehensive reviews of iatrogenic cutaneous injury. The purpose of this review is to describe the iatrogenic cutaneous injuries that may occur in the newborns as a consequence of perinatal and postnatal medical procedures. With increased survival of extremely-low-birth-weight (ELBW) infants and changing modes of management in the NICU, neonatologists must make every effort to recognize injuries and prevent their occurrence in the NICU.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/14767051003728245

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Current monitoring systems can cause iatrogenic skin injuries including adhesive-related tears, burns, infections, or pressure sores, leading to long-term morbidity.

    “These systems can also cause iatrogenic skin injuries including adhesive-related tears, burns, infections, or pressure sores, leading to long-term morbidity. 3”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sardesai, S. R., Kornacka, M. K., Walas, W., & Ramanathan, R.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Sardesai, Smeeta R.
Venue
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
Published
2010-06-14
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
197-203
ISSN
  • 1476-4954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-7058
OpenAlex
W2099799641
Cited by
73
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Neonatal skin health care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
Keywords
neonatal intensive care, extremely low birth weight infants, central venous catheters, mechanical ventilation, continuous positive airway pressure, low birth weight, gestational age, neonatal procedures, skin damage prevention
MeSH terms
Burns, Cicatrix, Humans, Iatrogenic Disease, Infant, Newborn, Intensive Care Units, Neonatal, Scalp, Skin, Skin Diseases, Intensive Care, Neonatal, Infant, Extremely Low Birth Weight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review