Cited by 178Assistive Technology in Communication and MobilityNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Living successfully with aphasia: A qualitative meta-analysis of the perspectives of individuals with aphasia, family members, and speech-language pathologists

Brown, Kyla, Worrall, Linda E., Davidson, Bronwyn, Howe, Tami·2012·International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

Abstract

The concept of living successfully with aphasia has recently emerged as an alternative to more traditional "deficit" models in aphasiology, encouraging a focus on positive rather than negative outcomes. This research aimed to integrate findings from studies exploring the perspectives of three participant groups (individuals with aphasia, speech-language pathologists, and family members) about living successfully with aphasia. Qualitative meta-analysis of three studies conducted by the authors was used to integrate perspectives across the participant groups. Steps in the qualitative meta-analysis were based on those described in the process of "meta-ethnography" by Noblit and Hare (1988) . Analysis was an inductive process, in which data from each study were re-analysed and translated into each other in order to identify higher-level overarching themes that accounted for similarities and discrepancies across the original studies. A total of seven overarching themes related to living successfully with aphasia were identified. These were: participation, meaningful relationships, support, communication, positivity, independence and autonomy, and living successfully with aphasia as a journey over time. Findings indicate the need for a holistic, client-centred approach that considers communication in the broader context of an individual's daily life. The overarching themes may act as guides for areas of importance to be addressed in clinical practice, as well as in future research. By working in partnership with individuals with aphasia and their families, speech-language pathologists are challenged to continue to improve services and assist clients on their journey of living successfully with aphasia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/17549507.2011.632026

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, K., Worrall, L. E., Davidson, B., & Howe, T.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • University of Canterbury (NZ)
Corresponding author
Brown, Kyla
Venue
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Published
2011-12-12
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
141-155
ISSN
  • 1441-7049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-9507
  • 1754-9515
OpenAlex
W2062506015
Cited by
178
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
aphasia, deficit model, person-centered approach, participation, meaningful relationships, social support, communication, autonomy and independence, family perspectives, speech-language pathologists, positive outcomes, holistic care
MeSH terms
Aphasia, Communication, Family, Humans, Patient Participation, Professional-Family Relations, Quality of Life, Social Support, Specialization, Speech-Language Pathology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review