Cited by 68Natural Language Processing TechniquesTranslation Studies and PracticesTopic Modeling

Human Effort and Machine Learnability in Computer Aided Translation

Open access
Green, Spence, Wang, Sida I., Chuang, Jason, Heer, Jeffrey, Schuster, Sebastian, Manning, Christopher D.·2014·Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)

Abstract

Spence Green, Sida I. Wang, Jason Chuang, Jeffrey Heer, Sebastian Schuster, Christopher D. Manning. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 2014.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3115/v1/d14-1130

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. M. Carl. 2010. A computational framework for a cogni- tive model of human translation processes. In Aslib Translating and the Computer Conference.
  2. P. Langlais, G. Foster, and G. Lapalme. 2000. TransType: a computer-aided translation typing sys- tem. In Workshop on Embedded Machine Transla- tion Systems.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Green, S., Wang, S. I., Chuang, J., Heer, J., Schuster, S., & Manning, C. D.
Affiliations
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)
Published
2014
Pages
1225-1236
OpenAlex
W2251171258
Cited by
68
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7
FWCI
4.71
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
  • Advanced Research Projects Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Translation Studies and Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
computer-assisted translation, human effort, translation quality, human-machine interaction, machine translation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review