Food habits of gaur (Bos gaurus gaurus Smith, 1827) and livestock (cows and buffaloes) in Parsa Wild
Open accessAbstract
Food habits of gaur (Bos gaurus gaurus) and livestock (cows and buffaloes) have been studied from January to June 1998 in Parsa Wildlife Reserve, Nepal. The study aimed to understand the diet composition and common plant used by gaur and livestock. Gaurs are both grazers and browsers. The diet of gaur comprised of 38 plant species (20 species of grass, 11 species of browse and 7 species of herb and others) and that of livestock comprised of 35 plant species (19 species of grass, 13 species of browse and 3 species of herb and others). A comparative analysis of plants consumption revealed that gaurs are less selective feeder than livestock. A total of 24 plant species (16 species of grass, 6 species of browse and 2 species of herb and others) were common in the diet of gaur and livestock. 7 species of plants (5 species of grass – Cymbopogon sp., Imperata cylindrica, Phragmites karka, Themeda sp., Vetiveria zizanoides; 1 species of browse – Phaulopsis imbricata and 1 species of herb – Piper longum) are comparatively more utilized by both gaur and livestock. Himalayan Journal of Sciences 1(1): 31-36, 2003
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Nepal, B. gaurus has been found to feed on 49 plant species (23 grasses, 17 browse species, and 9 herbs and others).
“in Nepal, B. gaurus has been found to feed on 49 plant species (23 grasses, 17 browse species, and 9 herbs and others- Chetri 2003Chetri , 2006) )”
From Bos frontalis and Bos gaurus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) (2018) · cites this paper as Chetri 2003
The paper reports different counts for gaur in Parsa Wildlife Reserve, Nepal. Its pooled analysis (Food habits: gaur vs. livestock, p. 3) records 38 plant species—20 grasses, 11 browse species, and 7 herbs and others—not the attributed 49, 23, 17, and 9. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredBos gaurus is primarily a grazer.
“Although Bos gaurus eats a diverse array of plant species and plant parts, a growing body of evidence suggests it is primarily a grazer.”
From Bos frontalis and Bos gaurus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) (2018) · cites this paper as Chetri 2003
The opening summary (p. 1) describes gaur as both grazers and browsers and lists 20 grass species among 38 plants in their diet. The Food and food habits of gaur section (pp. 2–3) reports frequent grass consumption but also substantial browsing; counts of plant species do not establish that most of the diet is grass. The source supports grazing, but not the stronger claim that gaur is primarily a grazer. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn Nepal, grasses made up 66%, browse 26%, and herbs and other plants 8% of the diet of B. gaurus.
“grasses made up 66%, browse 26%, and herbs and other plants 8% of the diet of B. gaurus studied in Nepal (Chetri 2003(Chetri , 2006));”
From Bos frontalis and Bos gaurus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) (2018) · cites this paper as Chetri 2003
The paper studies gaur diets in Nepal and identifies grasses, browse, and herbs and other plants as food categories (Food habits of gaur, p. 1). But its figures are counts of plant species consumed, not percentages of the diet; the cited 66%, 26%, and 8% are not supported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredBos gaurus eats far more species than just grasses.
“Bos gaurus, however, eats far more species than just grasses.”
From Bos frontalis and Bos gaurus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) (2018) · cites this paper as Chetri 2003
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Brander, A. A. D. (1982). Gaur and Buffalo. In: Wild Animals in Central India, pp. 145-166. Natraj Publishers Dchra Dun (India)
- Chetri, M. (1999). Food habit, habitat utilization and conservation of gaur (Bos gaurus gaurus) in Parsa Wildlife Reserve, Nepal. M. Sc. Thesis, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal
- Chetri, M. and K. Basnet (2001). Wildlife management and development of ecotourism: A case study of Gaur in Parsa Wildlife Reserve, Nepal. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Himalayan Environments: Mountain Sciences and Ecotourism/Biodiversity, T. Watanabe, S. Siroff, N. R. Khanal and M. P. Gautam (Eds.), pp. 141-151 Dhungel, S. K. and B. W. O'gara (1991). Ecology of Hog deer in Royal Chitwan
- Gurung, K. K. (1983). Ungulates (hoofed mammals). In: Heart of the Jungle: The Wildlife of Chitwan, Nepal, pp. 26-43. Andre Deutch, U.K. and Tiger Tops, Nepal
- Kirby, D. R. and M. Parman. (1986). Botanical composition and diet quality of cattle under a short duration grazing system. Journal of Range Management 39: 509-512
- Krishnan, M. (1972). An ccological survey of the larger mammals of Peninsular India. Journal of Bombay Natural History Society 69: 298-349
- Koirala, R. A. and R. Shrestha. (1997). Floristic composition of summer habitats and dietary relationships between tibetan argali (Ovis ammon hodgsonii), naur (Pscudois nayaur) and domestic goat (Capra hircus) in the Damodar Kunda region of upper Mustang in Nepal Himalaya. M. Sc. Thesis, Agricultural University of Norway.
- Prater, S. H. (1971). Wild oxen, Sheep, Goats. In: The Book of Indian Animals. Bombay Natural History Society, 3rd edition, pp. 234-260. Oxford University Press
- Ranjitsinh, M. K. (1991). Deer, Antelopes and Bovines. In: Indian Wildlife, S. Isracl and T. Sinclair (Eds.), pp. 91-98. APA Publications (HK) LTD
- Schaller, G. B. (1967). The deer and the tiger: A study of wildlife in India. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
- Shukla, R. and P. K. Khare (1998). Food habits of wild ungulates and their competition with livestock in Pench Wildlife Reserve, Central India. Journal of Bombay Natural History Society 95: 418 -421
- Schaller, G. B. (1977). Mountain monarchs: Wild sheep and goats of the Himalaya. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
- Tamang, K. M. (1982). The status of the tiger (Panthera tigris tigris) and its impacts on principal prey populations in the Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Ph. D. Thesis, Michigan State University, USA
- Wegge, P. (1976). Himalayan shikar rescrve: Surveys and management proposals. FAO/NEP/72/002. Field Doc. 5, Tribhuvan University Press, and Kathmandu
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ahrestani, F. S., Heitkönig, I., & Prins, H. (2012) · Journal of Tropical Ecology · doi:10.1017/s0266467412000302 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Bos frontalis and Bos gaurus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae)
Ahrestani, F. S. (2018) · Mammalian Species · doi:10.1093/mspecies/sey004 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“Common names of the wild form in other languages include tadok (Adi); peeoug (Burmese); kaati, kaadu kona, kaadu yemme (Kannada); kulga, gameya (Kannada in Uttara Kannada district); duddu (Kannada in Northern Udupi district); meuay (Lao); seladang (Malay); Da-E-Ni, 大额牛 (Mandarin); raangawa (Marathi); kattu pothu (Mala…”
InfluentialChetri, M. (1970) · Our Nature · doi:10.3126/on.v4i1.499 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Grazing and Browsing by Large Herbivores in South and Southeast Asia
Ahrestani, F. S., HEITKÖNIG, I. M. A., Matsubayashi, H., & Prins, H. H. T. (2016) · Ecological studies · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-7570-0_4 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Gaur (Bos gaurus C. H. Smith, 1827)
Ahrestani, F. S., & Ullas Karanth, K. (2014) · Ecology, Evolution and Behaviour of Wild Cattle · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139568098.013 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Poudel, S., Pokhrel, B., Neupane, B., Miya, M. S., Kc, N., Basyal, C. R., Neupane, A., & Dhami, B. (2024) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.18035 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Indigenous knowledge of terrace management in Paundi Khola watershed, Lamjung district, Nepal
Pandit, K., & Balla, M. K. (1970) · Himalayan Journal of Sciences · doi:10.3126/hjs.v2i3.228 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Thing, S. B., Karki, J. B., Lamichhane, B. R., et al. (2022) · Journal of Threatened Taxa · doi:10.11609/jott.6178.14.3.20703-20712 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Bhattarai, B. P., Katuwal, H. B., Regmi, S., et al. (2025) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.71189 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“However, gaur populations are now limited to specific pockets within Chitwan and Parsa National Parks (Chetri 2003).”
- Authors
- Chetri, M.
- Corresponding author
- Chetri, M
- ORCID
- Chetri, M
- Venue
- Himalayan Journal of Sciences
- Publisher
- Nepal Journals Online (JOL)
- Published
- 1970-01-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-36
- ISSN
- 1727-5210 (ISSN-L)
- 1727-5229
- OpenAlex
- W2164742861
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Himalayan Journal of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant and animal studies
- Keywords
- gaur, Bos gaurus, livestock nutrition, diet composition, plant uses, grazing and browsing, Poaceae, browse, feeding selectivity, Imperata cylindrica, Phragmites karka, Piper longum
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review