The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 42 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Compilation of stable isotope fractionation factors of geochemical interest
Open accessAbstract
Phase equilibrium relations of the common rock-forming oxides except water, by G
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
18 No full text of the sources · 16 No basis given · 14 Own interpretation · 11 Sources not found · 11 Own method · 5 Not checked yet · 2 Own result
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This latter SMOW has been analyzed in many laboratories, and the oxygen isotope composition has been found by many investigators to be identical to the originally defined SMOW within the limits of analytical uncertainty (±0.05°/oo)-”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > OXYGEN
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, several recent determinations of this factor indicate that the factor is probably larger than 1.0407 (table 2).”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > OXYGEN
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The SO18 value of NBS-28 reported to the authors from several laboratories indicate a range between 9.5 and 9.9.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > OXYGEN
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Recent determinations indicate that the latter value is closer to-28.10 (Mook, 1971;Letolle, 1971;F. C. Tan, unpub. data, 1973;J. D. Gleason and I. Friedman, unpub. data, 1973).”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > CARBON
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Mook, 1971 source
- Not matchedcites Letolle, 1971
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites F. C. Tan, unpub. data, 1973
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When the results of deuterium analyses of the four I.A.E.A. standard waters were compared several years ago, significant discrepancies in 8 D were apparent.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > HYDROGEN
plainn = 4- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“NOTE.The average of all the published analyses, excepting the value of 1.0424 (Staschewski, 1964), is 1.0412.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > OXYGEN
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Staschewski, 1964
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If the acid fractionation factor of 1.01109 is used for dolomite, this value becomes +2.3.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > FIGURE 26
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The constant dolomite-calcite fractionation of +3.1 in the temperature range 25° to 79°C is calculated from data on synthesized protodolomites, using the acid fractionation factor of 1.01025 for both carbonates.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > FIGURE 26
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The plagioclase-magnetite curves formulated by Anderson, Clayton, and Mayeda (1971) are virtually identical to those shown in the figure.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > TEMPERATURE, IN DEGREES CELSIUS
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Anderson, Clayton, and Mayeda (1971)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“The correct statement should have been that the SO 18 value of the CO 2 produced by reaction of 100 percent H 3 PO4 with PDB calcite at 25°C is +0.22 per mil relative to CO2 equilibrated at 25°C with SMOW water.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > OXYGEN
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Craig (1961)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
- It may state two separate claims as one. 14
- Probably not a substantial claim. 27
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“That is, merely subtracting S values will be an excellent approximation to the per mil fractionation and identical to it within the limits of analytical error for values of both A 's and 6 's, which are less than about 10.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > 3. 103 lna AND THE A VALUE
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Recent measurements by Coplen and Clayton (1973) on a high-resolution mass spectrometer (Hs”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > HYDROGEN
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Coplen and Clayton (1973) source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The I.A.E.A. sample of water called SMOW has been analyzed in several laboratories and is not identical in D/H ratio to the defined SMOW.Coplen and Clayton (1973), for example, report a 8D value of -1.2.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > HYDROGEN
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Coplen and Clayton (1973) source
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Friedman has recently measured the hydrogen isotope compositions of 4 separate samples of NBS-1 that he received over the past 20 years and found differences in 8D as high as 8°/oo.Therefore some of the interlaboratory differences observed may depend on the batch of NBS-1 standard utilized.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > HYDROGEN
hedgedconditionaln = 4- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To relate 8 O 18 values of calcite on the PDB and SMOW scales, the following expressions are used: 8 sMow=1 -030868 PDB + 30.86, and 8 PDB=0.970068SMOW-29.94.These relationships are based on the following fractionation factors at 25°C: 1.0412 for CO2-H2O, 1.01025 for H 3PO4-liberated CO2 from calcite and, 1.00022 for H 3PO4-liberated CO2 from PDB-CO2 in equilibrium with SMOW.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > OXYGEN
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is some indication that random and significant variations in 5O18 exist between different samplings of the main storage vessels of the NBS water standards.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > OXYGEN
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“NOTE.Sodium and potassium feldspar have identical isotopic properties within the limits of analytical uncertainty.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > FIGURE 48
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Potassium feldspar has isotopic properties identical to albite within the limits of analytical error.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > TEMPERATURE, IN DEGREES CELSIUS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The crossover point (10s Ina = 0) occurs at 130°C, and there is a reversal at 425°C 10s In a--48).”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > FIGURE 48
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Additional data on these systems by O'Neil and Truesdell (written commun., 1976) are not shown but are in agreement with those of Sofer and Gat (1972) and of Taube (1954).”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > TEMPERATURE, IN DEGREES CELSIUS
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites O'Neil and Truesdell (written commun., 1976)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites Sofer and Gat (1972)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Taube (1954) source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Note the crossover point at 192°C.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > FIGURE 48
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“NOTE.Muscovite and paragonite have identical isotopic properties within the limits of analytical uncertainty.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > TEMPERATURE, IN DEGREES CELSIUS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the oxygen isotope analysis of carbonates, identical physical and chemical conditions must be operative during preparation of standard and sample so that systematic errors will cancel.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > OXYGEN
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Equilibrium fractionation factors that measure the distribution of a rare stable isotope between two species have been determined directly by laboratory experiments and also by calculations using the methods of statistical thermodynamics.They have also been inferred from regularities in the stable isotope ratios of natural materials.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Urey (1947) source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The 8 values given by Craig (1957) for these standards are -1.06 and -27.79, respectively.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > CARBON
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Craig (1957) source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The H3 + contribution to the mass 3 beam cannot be determined precisely.Consequently, when this contribution is large ( > 10 percent), the correction may result in incorrect 8 values.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > HYDROGEN
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As geothermometers, stable isotope fractionation factors continue to show considerable promise for a variety of geologic environments.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > Remarks
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is encouraging that the two curves are so similar and that the slope for this important system is fairly certain.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > Remarks
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This curve should show a reversal of slope at low temperature similar to that shown by the magnetite-water system.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > FIGURE 48
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is enough consistency in the natural data to warrant future investigations aimed at reconciling some of the discrepancies in the experimental data.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > Remarks
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, some of the discrepancies among the experimental curves are undoubtedly the result of nonequilibrium or kinetic isotope effects, which can often be difficult to recognize.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > STABLE ISOTOPE FRACTIONATION CURVES
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This curve is based on measurements at only two temperatures, 350° and 400°C.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > FIGURE 26
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Sulfur hexafluoride has some advantages over sulfur dioxide for sulfur isotopic analysis.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > SULFUR
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This curve is a least-squares fit to the authors' data.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > FIGURE 26
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Temperatures can be read to ±0.5°C on some curves and to ±5°C on others.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > STABLE ISOTOPE FRACTIONATION CURVES
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The expressions are independent of the standard used.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > FIGURES 2-49 FIGURE 2
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The calculated fractionation factors for gaseous systems are among the most reliable factors presented here.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > Remarks
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Except for the feldspars and micas (O'Neil and Taylor, 1967Taylor, , 1969)), rutile (Addy and Garlick, 1974), and magnetite (Bertenrath and Friedrichsen, 1975) the factor 1.0407 was used in the determination of the isotopic compositions of the waters used in all the experiments.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > STABLE ISOTOPE FRACTIONATION CURVES
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites O'Neil and Taylor, 1967
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Addy and Garlick, 1974 source
- Not matchedcites Bertenrath and Friedrichsen, 1975
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The quartz-magnetite pair is potentially the most useful, and certainly the most sensitive, pair for oxygen isotope thermometry”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > Remarks
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The curves proposed by Bottinga andJavoy (1973, 1974) are presented, inasmuch as they are self-consistent and take into account much of the experimental work and theoretical considerations.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > Remarks
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Bottinga and Javoy (1973, 1974)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is an extrapolation of their lower temperature data.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > TEMPERATURE, IN DEGREES CELSIUS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Presenting all these data together uncritically calls attention to the problem areas that require resolution.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > Remarks
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Solenhofen Limestone standard is actually too fine grained to be a good and lasting standard.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > CARBON
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is clear from reading the details given in the original references that some systems have been examined more thoroughly than others.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > Remarks
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“NOTE.8 W is incorrectly defined in the original paper.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > T E M P E R A T U R E , IN DE GRE E S CELSI US, FOR 8O 18
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Longinelli and Nutti (1973)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fractionations (103lna) can normally be read to ±0.2 per mil.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > STABLE ISOTOPE FRACTIONATION CURVES
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The mass spectrometric corrections for sulfur dioxide are large”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > SULFUR
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The curves have been extrapolated beyond the temperature ranges investigated and even beyond the range of stability of some minerals.This was done to provide rough estimates when no other information is available.”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > STABLE ISOTOPE FRACTIONATION CURVES
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The stable isotope relations are somewhat obscured by experimental difficulties and nonequilbrium effects”
§ DATA OF GEOCHEMISTRY, SIXTH EDITION > Remarks
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The authors state this as an assumption.
The fractionation at 25°C is 40.37 for the CO2-H2O system.
“The data have been plotted assuming that the fractionation at 25°C is 40.37.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
For purposes of geothermometry, Δ_quartz-illmenite = 0.95 Δ_quartz-magnetite.
“Based on natural data, it is commonly assumed for purposes of geothermometry that Aquam-illimenite = 0.95 Aquartz.magnetite .”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“the paleotempertaure under which the calcite have precipitated is interpreted to have occurred between approximately 13˚C to ±33˚C (from analyzed samples; see calculation above).”
From Isotopes (13C and 18O) Geochemistry of Lower Triassic Montney Formation, Northeastern British Columbia, Western Canada (2017) · cites this paper as [35]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This pattern is consistent with temperature-dependent δ 18 O depletion on carbonate minerals at elevated temperatures [103-105].”
From Clumped Isotope Reordering and Kinetic Differences in Co-Hosted Calcite and Dolomite Minerals throughout Burial Diagenesis and Exhumation (2023) · cites this paper as [104]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Therefore, paleotemperature of precipitation of calcite during the Lower Triassic Period in the study area is ~32˚C.”
From Isotopes (13C and 18O) Geochemistry of Lower Triassic Montney Formation, Northeastern British Columbia, Western Canada (2017) · cites this paper as [35]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“The anoxic condition generate high alkalinity, which increases the total dissolved carbon that causes calcite to precipitate from pore-water, thereby biased towards light δ 13 C PDB values during early diagenesis [35].”
From Isotopes (13C and 18O) Geochemistry of Lower Triassic Montney Formation, Northeastern British Columbia, Western Canada (2017) · cites this paper as [35]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Citations
Cites
Craig, H. (1957) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(57)90024-8 · Cited by 4,170
On the Isotopic Chemistry of Carbonates and a Paleotemperature Scale
McCrea, J. M. (1950) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1747785 · Cited by 3,742
Oxygen Isotope Fractionation in Divalent Metal Carbonates
O'Neil, J. R., Clayton, R. N., & Mayeda, T. K. (1969) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1671982 · Cited by 2,549
Self-citationThe thermodynamic properties of isotopic substances
Urey, H. C. (1947) · Journal of the Chemical Society (Resumed) · doi:10.1039/jr9470000562 · Cited by 2,544
Revised Carbonate-water isotopic temperature scale
EPSTEIN, S., BUCHSBAUM, R., LOWENSTAM, H. A., & UREY, H. C. (1953) · Geological Society of America Bulletin · doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1953)64[1315:rcits]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 2,271
Calculation of Equilibrium Constants for Isotopic Exchange Reactions
Bigeleisen, J., & Mayer, M. G. (1947) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1746492 · Cited by 1,893
Carbon isotope fractionation between dissolved bicarbonate and gaseous carbon dioxide
Mook, W. G., Bommerson, J. C., & Staverman, W. H. (1974) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/0012-821x(74)90078-8 · Cited by 1,659
Oxygen isotope exchange between quartz and water
Clayton, R. N., O'Neil, J. R., & Mayeda, T. K. (1972) · Journal of Geophysical Research · doi:10.1029/jb077i017p03057 · Cited by 1,513
Self-citationTarutani, T., Clayton, R. N., & Mayeda, T. K. (1969) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(69)90108-2 · Cited by 663
Carbon isotope fractionation during the precipitation of calcium carbonate
Emrich, K., Ehhalt, D. H., & Vogel, J. C. (1970) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/0012-821x(70)90109-3 · Cited by 610
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- [23]23. Becker, R. H., 1971, Carbon and oxygen isotope ratios in iron- formation and associated rocks from the Hamersley Range of Western Australia and their implications: Chicago Univ. Ph. D. thesis, 138 p.
- [30]30. ____1969a, Calculated fractionation factors for carbon and hydrogen isotope exchange in the system calcite-CO2-graphite-methane- hydrogen and water vapor: Geochim. et. Cosmochim. Acta, v. 33, p. 49-64. _1969b, Carbon isotope fractionation between graphite, diamond and carbon dioxide: Earth and Planetary Sci. Letters, v. 5, p. 301-307.
- [47]47. Epstein, S., 1976, A revised oxygen paleotemperature scale: Geol. Soc. America Bull, (in press).
- [102]102. Rennow, M., 1970, Gleichgewichts-und kinetische Trennfactoren bei der verdunstung von wasser: II Physikalisches Institut der Uni- versitat Heidelberg Ph. D. thesis, 217 p.
- [103]103. Robinson, R., 1973, Sulfur isotopic equilibrium during sulfur hy- drolysis at high temperature: Earth and Planetary Sci. Letters, v. 18, no. 3, p. 443-450.
- [107]107. Sharan, Y., Galas, C., Lees, E., and Zhook, V., 1974, Experimental determination of the sulfur isotope exchange equilibrium constant in the system H2S(g)-H2S(solution): National Symposium on Stable Isotope Geochemistry, 5th, Moscow, Program Pt. I, p. 31 [in Russian].
- [111]111. Sofer, Z., and Gat, J. R., 1972, Activities and concentrations of oxygen- 18 in concentrated aqueous salt solutions: Earth and Planetary Sci. Letters, v. 15, no. 3, p. 232-238.
- [116]116. Suvorova, V. A., 1974, Temperature dependence of the distribution coefficient of sulfur isotopes between equilibrium sulfides: Nat- ional Symposium on Stable Isotope Geochemistry, 5th, Moscow, Program Pt. 1, p. 128 [in Russian].
- [121]121. Taylor, B. E., 1976, Origin and significance of C-O-H fluids in the formation of Ca-Fe-Si skarn, Osgood Mountains, Humboldt County, Nev.: Stanford Univ., Ph. D thesis.
- [129]129. Vogel, J. C., 1959, Isotopen trennfaktoren des Kohlenstoffs im Gleichgewichtssystem Kohlendioxyd-Bikarbonat-Karbonat: Heidelberg Univ. Ph. D. thesis, 196 p. ____1961, Isotope fractionation factors of carbon in the equilibrium system CO2-HCO~-CO=: Summer Course of Nuclear Geology, Varenna 1960, Proc., Italian Comm. Nuclear Energy, p. 216-221.
- [132]132. Wendt, I., Stahl, W., Geyh, M., and Fauth, F., 1966, Model experi- ments for 14C-water age determinations: Symposium on isotopes in hydrology, Internal. Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna 1966, Proc., p. 321-336 [1967].
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 2,301–2,400 of 2,627
Genetic Types, Classifications, and Models of Manganese-Ore Formation
(2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-803165-0.00003-3 · Cited by 3
James, N. P., & Bone, Y. (2022) · Sedimentology · doi:10.1111/sed.13019 · Cited by 3
Jia, W., Xiong, H. Y., Zhu, G., et al. (2022) · Water · doi:10.3390/w14172700 · Cited by 3
Pokrovsky, B. G., Zaitsev, A. V., Bujakaite, M. I., & Dronov, A. V. (2022) · Lithology and Mineral Resources · doi:10.1134/s0024490222060050 · Cited by 3
“The δ34S values are given in ‰ relative to the CDT meteorite standard; δ13C values, in ‰ relative to the PDB standard, δ18O values, in ‰ relative to the SMOW standard, which is related to the PDB standard used in many works by the formula (Friedman and O’Neil, 1977) in the following way: δ(18)OSMOW = 1.”
MethodInfluentialFaure, G., & Mensing, T. M. (2010) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9390-5_17 · Cited by 4
DIAGENEZA A POROWATOŚĆ PIASKOWCÓW JURY DOLNEJ NA NIŻU POLSKIM
Kozłowska, A., & Kuberska, M. (2015) · Biuletyn Państwowego Instytutu Geologicznego · doi:10.5604/08676143.1113229 · Cited by 3
Środoń, J. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-3609-5_115 · Cited by 3
Yun, S., So, C., Choi, S.-H., & Heo, C. (2001) · Geosciences Journal · doi:10.1007/bf02910307 · Cited by 3
A BASIC-programme for the calculation of O-isotope temperatures
Hoernes, S. (1980) · Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology · doi:10.1007/bf00375496 · Cited by 3
Bychkov, A. Y., Kikvadze, O. E., Lavrushin, V. Y., & Kuleshov, V. N. (2007) · Geochemistry International · doi:10.1134/s0016702907030032 · Cited by 3
Wilson, A. F. (1979) · Journal of the Geological Society of Australia · doi:10.1080/00167617908729065 · Cited by 3
Rao, C. P., Amini, Z., & Franklin, D. (1996) · Papers and proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania · doi:10.26749/rstpp.130.2.87 · Cited by 3
Chi, G., & Lavoie, D. (2000) · doi:10.4095/211174 · Cited by 3
“Case 1 If type A biphase fluid inclusions are assumed to be primary, the possible range of d18O of the parent fluids may be calculated from the d18O value of the calcite and the range of homogenization temperatures, using the equation of Friedman and O’Neil (1977).”
MethodDer 18O-Index — ein Beitrag zur Geochemie der Silikate
Schütze, H. (1986) · Isotopenpraxis Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies · doi:10.1080/10256018608623621 · Cited by 3
The geology and mineralization of the Northern Plomosa District, La Paz County, Arizona
Duncan, J. T. (1990) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) · Cited by 3
Ishak, M. I. S. (2014) · uO Research (University of Ottawa) · doi:10.20381/ruor-3542 · Cited by 3
“05261) for hydrogen isotopes during evaporation (Temperature, TEMP in Kelvin, K) [Friedman and O’Neil, 1977], ∆ε =α-1, and δI, δA, δs are the mean δ 18 O (or δ 2 H) values of precipitation, ambient moisture, and outflow, respectively.”
Background(2009) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-51115-7.00028-0 · Cited by 3
Fritz, P., & Fontes, J. (1980) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-41780-0.50006-7 · Cited by 3
Hondo evaporites within the Grosmont heavy oil carbonate platform, Alberta, Canada
Borrero, M. L. (2010) · Bogotá (Banco de la República) · doi:10.7939/r3qh29 · Cited by 3
Geochemistry and petrography of speleothems from Turkey and Iran : palaeoclimate and diagenesis
Wickens, L. (2013) · UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) · Cited by 3
Oxygen isotope geochemistry of The Geysers reservoir rocks, California
Gunderson, R. P., & Moore, J. N. (1994) · University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) · Cited by 3
Kim, S., Kim, S., & Knyf, M. (2025) · Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/rcm.9958 · Cited by 2
“For dolomite, the AFF of 1.01109 was used at 25°C while that of 1.00986 was used at 72°C [2, 34, 35].”
InfluentialSong, X., Lv, Z., Zang, C., et al. (2023) · Minerals · doi:10.3390/min13010080 · Cited by 2
Ndengwe, A. T., Njoh, O. A., & Njamnsi, N. Y. (2023) · Aquatic Geochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10498-023-09413-4 · Cited by 2
“The Standard Mean Ocean Water (SMOW) conversion values to PDB (Peedee Belemnite) standard were carried out using the following equation δ18O calcite (SMOW) = 1.03086 δ18O calcite (PDB) + 30.86 (Friedman and ONeil 1977).”
MethodInfluentialDuan, W., Tan, M., Wang, L., Wang, X., Ma, Z., Cui, L., & Xiao, Z. (2023) · Science China Earth Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11430-022-1190-0 · Cited by 2
Cao, Z., Qing, H., Azmy, K., Zhang, L., Li, Z., Zhu, S., Han, C., Wei, Q., & Yin, N. (2024) · Geological Journal · doi:10.1002/gj.5109 · Cited by 2
“The estimated δ 18 O SMOW values of the calcite and ferroan calcite can be calculated using the homogenization temperatures of two-phase primary aqueous inclusions (Table S2) using the equation of Friedman and O'Neil (1977) (10 3 ln α calcite/ferrocalcite-water = 2.78 × 10 6 /T 2 –2.89).”
InfluentialYu, C.-D., Wang, K., Liu, X., et al. (2025) · Ore Geology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2025.106616 · Cited by 2
Cheng, B., Luo, X., Qiu, Z., et al. (2025) · Minerals · doi:10.3390/min15070681 · Cited by 2
Zhang, B., Wang, W., Lu, Q., Wang, W., Teng, X., & Chen, L. (2025) · International Journal of Coal Geology · doi:10.1016/j.coal.2025.104867 · Cited by 2
Carbon trapping during contact metamorphism in volcanic basins: example of the Guaymas basin
Cheviet, A., Gonçalves, P., Choulet, F., et al. (2025) · Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology · doi:10.1007/s00410-025-02262-0 · Cited by 2
“Subsequently, δ 18 O values were normalised to the V-SMOW standard and δ 13 C to the V-PDB standard (Craig 1961; Friedman and O’Neil 1977).”
Dang, H., Tong, H., Sun, P., Ma, D., & Ren, X. (2025) · Ore Geology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2025.106924 · Cited by 2
da Rocha, E. C., Schmidt, J. S., Souza, M., et al. (2025) · Journal of Sedimentary Research · doi:10.2110/jsr.2025.012 · Cited by 2
Addi, M. A., Aissa, M., Loudaoued, I., et al. (2026) · Journal of African Earth Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2026.106035 · Cited by 2
Catagenetic Mineralization in the Platform Cover of the Mikhailov Deposit, Kursk Magnetic Anomaly
Tsekhovskii, Y. G., Lavrushin, V. Y., Kuleshov, V. N., et al. (2002) · Lithology and Mineral Resources · doi:10.1023/a:1015430129588 · Cited by 2
Coleman, M. L., Cox, M., & Taylor, R. P. (1984) · Chemical Geology · doi:10.1016/0009-2541(84)90043-3 · Cited by 2
Inoue, A., Hara, J., & Imai, A. (2001) · Shigen-Chishitsu · doi:10.11456/shigenchishitsu1992.51.101 · Cited by 2
Eren, M., Kadır, S., & Akgöz, M. (2017) · Turkish Journal of Engineering · doi:10.31127/tuje.316859 · Cited by 2
Gongalsky, B. I., & Krivolutskaya, N. (2019) · Modern approaches in solid earth sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-03559-4_3 · Cited by 2
Zedam, R., Laouar, R., Lekoui, A., et al. (2022) · Arabian Journal of Geosciences · doi:10.1007/s12517-022-09611-4 · Cited by 2
“…between 160 to 210 °C) and these oxygen isotope data of quartz II samples the calculated oxygen isotopic composition the fluid (δ18Ofluid) from which quartz II precipitated, varies between + 6 and + 12‰ (isotopic fractionation equation for quartz-water pairs are from Friedman and O’Neil 1977).”
Zhang, X., Li, Q., You, X., et al. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15062155 · Cited by 2
The first report on the use of deuterium-labelled water in analysing the splash phenomenon
Polakowski, C., Beczek, M., Mazur, R., Sochan, A., Ryżak, M., & Bieganowski, A. (2022) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127882 · Cited by 2
Zhang, S., Wu, K., Na, L., et al. (2022) · Minerals · doi:10.3390/min12111413 · Cited by 2
“Oxygen isotope values of calcite plotted on the temperature—dependent, calcite—water oxygen fractionation curve ([60,61]).”
BackgroundDeSantis, L. R. G., Archer, M., Black, K. H., Hand, S. J., & Korasidis, V. A. (2023) · Alcheringa An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology · doi:10.1080/03115518.2023.2268680 · Cited by 2
Hasiuk, F. J., Wahbi, A. M., González, L. A., Blum, M. D., & Ludvigson, G. A. (2024) · Geosciences · doi:10.3390/geosciences14050120 · Cited by 2
Cai, Y., Lv, Z., Qing, Y., et al. (2024) · Minerals · doi:10.3390/min14090899 · Cited by 2
Hollis, S., Dennis, P., Menuge, J., Doran, A., Marca, A., Davidheiser-Kroll, B., Wilkinson, J. J., Snell, K., Turner, O., Güven, J. F., et al. (2024) · Economic Geology · doi:10.5382/econgeo.5100 · Cited by 1
Carimán, P., Niklitschek, E. J., Leisen, M., et al. (2024) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology14010007 · Cited by 2
Edraki, M., Somarin, A. K., & Ashley, P. M. (2025) · Minerals · doi:10.3390/min15010095 · Cited by 2
Metasomatism of the carbonate rocks of the contact zone with the basalt
Stanienda-Pilecki, K. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-99145-y · Cited by 2
“It can therefore be considered as metasomatism, low-grade metamorphism 18–20 .”
Yu, R., Li, B., Wu, F., Yuan, Y., Huo, L., Zhang, Y., & Li, Z. (2021) · Geological Journal · doi:10.1002/gj.4252 · Cited by 2
“Isotopic compositions are reported relative to Pee Dee Belemnite (PDB) for δ13C, and the oxygen isotopic compositions were converted to δ18OSMOW, and expressed as δ18OSMOW = 1.03086 δ18OPDB + 30.86 (Friedman & O'Neil, 1977).”
MethodInfluentialOxygen isotope application in paleotemperature reconstruction and water cycle in the deep time
Bo, C., & Zhu, M. (2023) · Chinese Science Bulletin (Chinese Version) · doi:10.1360/tb-2022-1181 · Cited by 3
Inoue, A., Kotake, N., 坂庭康友, et al. (2002) · The Journal of the Geological Society of Japan · doi:10.5575/geosoc.108.465 · Cited by 2
Silva, G. D. L. P., & Xavier, R. P. (1997) · International Geology Review · doi:10.1080/00206819709465296 · Cited by 2
Transient calcite fracture fillings in a welded tuff, Snowshoe Mountain, Colorado
Hoch, A. R., Reddy, M. M., & Heymans, M. J. (2000) · Applied Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0883-2927(00)00009-3 · Cited by 2
Thomson, B., Fallick, A., Boyce, A., & Rice, C. M. (1994) · Mineralium Deposita · doi:10.1007/bf00191038 · Cited by 3
Hossain, H. M. Z., Sultan-Ul-Islam, M., Armstrong-Altrin, J. S., et al. (2014) · Journal of Life and Earth Science · doi:10.3329/jles.v8i0.20155 · Cited by 2
“1δ18Ocalcite (SMOW) = 1.03086 δ18Ocalcite (PDB) + 30.86 (Friedman and O’Neil, 1977).”
MethodInfluentialPetts, D. C., Longstaffe, F. J., Potter, J., Barr, S. M., & White, C. E. (2012) · Atlantic Geology · doi:10.4138/atlgeol.2012.003 · Cited by 2
Meyers, P. A. (1996) · Geo-Marine Letters · doi:10.1007/bf02202605 · Cited by 2
Akgül, M. (2016) · Journal of African Earth Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2015.12.027 · Cited by 2
ISOTOPIC SIGNATURE OF THE DIAGENETIC FLUIDS AND CEMENT IN THE TORTACHILLA LIMESTONE, SOUTH AUSTRALIA
Hossein, R. B., & Bone, Y. (2001) · Cited by 2
SOURCE OF CEMENT IN THE GREAT OOLITE RESERVOIR, STORRINGTON OIL FIELD, WEALD BASIN, SOUTH OF ENGLAND
Shabestari, G. H. M., Worden, R. H., & Marshall, J. (2009) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 2
Shimizu, T., & Aoki, M. (2001) · Shigen-Chishitsu · doi:10.11456/shigenchishitsu1992.51.133 · Cited by 2
Fluid properties and sources of Sixiangchang carbonate-associated mercury deposit, southwest China
Zhuo, Y., Huang, Y., Li, J., et al. (2019) · Acta Geochimica · doi:10.1007/s11631-019-00362-w · Cited by 2
“The values of d18OSMOW (Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water) were calculated based on the equation of Friedman and O’Neil (1977), where d18OSMOW = 1.03086 9 d 18OPDB ?”
MethodInfluentialSignificance of Fracture-Filling Rose-Like Calcite Crystal Clusters in the SE Pyrenees
Cruset, D., Ibáñez, J., Cantarero, I., John, C. M., & Travé, A. (2020) · Minerals · doi:10.3390/min10060522 · Cited by 2
“The yellow box indicates the range of δ(18)Ofluid calculated from the δ18O values of bladed calcites in Figure 8 in % VPDB and the measured clumped isotopes temperature, using the formula of [80].”
MethodZhang, Y., & Li, F. (2020) · Interpretation · doi:10.1190/int-2019-0069.1 · Cited by 2
Carbon and Oxygen Isotope Fractionation in ScleracUnian Corals: a Review
Swart, P. K. (1983) · Cited by 2
Madhavaraju, J., Scott, R. W., Sial, A. N., & Ramírez-Montoya, E. (2021) · Arabian Journal of Geosciences · doi:10.1007/s12517-021-07902-w · Cited by 2
“The conversion of δ18O VPDB values to SMOW values use the following formula: δ18Ocalci te (SMOW) = 1.03086 δ 18Ocalci te (VPDB) + 30.86 (Friedman and O’Neil, 1977).”
MethodInfluentialZhang, T., Feng, Y., Ge, X., Meng, W., Han, H., Yu, J., Zhang, W., Li, S., Li, X., & Gao, P. (2021) · Open Geosciences · doi:10.1515/geo-2020-0283 · Cited by 3
“89 [25]; ankerite is calculated according to the formula 10(3) ln αcalcite-water = 2.”
BackgroundMethodHerlambang, A., & John, C. M. (2023) · Marine and Petroleum Geology · doi:10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2023.106220 · Cited by 2
Biblical Events and Environments – Authentification of Controversial Archaeological Artifacts
Ayalon, A., Bar-Matthews, M., & Goren, Y. (2014) · Treatise on Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-095975-7.01219-5 · Cited by 2
Stable Isotope Techniques for Gas Source Mass Spectrometry
Sharp, Z. D. (2013) · Treatise on Geochemistry · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-095975-7.01425-x · Cited by 2
Proposed in situ secondary ion mass spectrometry on Mars
Inglebert, R. L., Klossa, B., Lorin, J. C., et al. (1995) · Planetary and Space Science · doi:10.1016/0032-0633(95)93404-2 · Cited by 2
Lavoie, D., Castagner, A., Haghnazar-Liseroudi, M., Ardakani, O., & Desrochers, A. (2018) · Sedimentary Geology · doi:10.1016/j.sedgeo.2018.07.001 · Cited by 5
The Marysvale Natural Analog Study: Preliminary oxygen isotope relations
Shea, M. E., & Foland, K. A. (1986) · Chemical Geology · doi:10.1016/0009-2541(86)90030-6 · Cited by 2
Deuterium as Natural Tracer in Groundwater from Neighbouring Area of Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve
Feurdean, L., & Feurdean, V. (1999) · Isotopes in Environmental and Health Studies · doi:10.1080/10256019908234093 · Cited by 2
So, C., Seong-Taek, Y., & Lee, J.-H. (1993) · JOURNAL OF MINERALOGY PETROLOGY AND ECONOMIC GEOLOGY · doi:10.2465/ganko.88.63 · Cited by 2
“Boiling of ore fluids during W-Mo mineralization could result in preferen tial loss of 16O-enriched vapor, resulting in higher ƒÂ18Owater values for the residual mineral izing fluid (Friedman and O'Neil, 1977).”
BackgroundMartinez, M. P., & Turi, B. (1978) · Bulletin of Volcanology · doi:10.1007/bf02597220 · Cited by 2
Mineral-water reactions in metamorphism and volcanism
Barnes, I. (1985) · Chemical Geology · doi:10.1016/0009-2541(85)90144-5 · Cited by 2
Marcano, M. C., Lohmann, K. C., & Pickett, E. (1998) · doi:10.2973/odp.proc.sr.159.010.1998 · Cited by 2
Paragenetic History of the Ordovician Trenton Group Carbonates, Southwestern Ontario: ABSTRACT
Colquhoun, U. B. I. (1990) · AAPG Bulletin · doi:10.1306/20b226ed-170d-11d7-8645000102c1865d · Cited by 2
“temperature during precipitation, assuming a shift of 2 %0 correlates to a 10°C variation in the temperature of formation (Friedman and O'Neil, 1977).”
BackgroundLab., T. (. S. O. R. N., Nativ, R., Halleran, A., et al. (1997) · doi:10.2172/631177 · Cited by 2
Cruset, D., Cantarero, I., Benedicto, A., John, C. M., Vergés, J., Albert, R., Gerdes, A., & Travé, A. (2020) · Data in Brief · doi:10.1016/j.dib.2020.105896 · Cited by 2
Ricketts, R. D. (1998) · Monographiae biologicae · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-1437-2_15 · Cited by 2
Improving the routine analysis of siderite for δ 13 C and δ 18 O in environmental change research
Lacey, J. H., Sloane, H. J., Leng, M. J., & Crowley, S. F. (2023) · Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/rcm.9456 · Cited by 1
Egbobawaye, E. I. (2017) · Natural Science · doi:10.4236/ns.2017.910034 · Cited by 1
“isotopic signature of depleted δ(18)OSMOW of [35] with respect to calcite-water fractionation equation, and dolomite-water fractionation of [38].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPressure-dependent joint elastic-electrical properties of calcite-cemented artificial sandstones
Han, T., Wang, P., & Fu, L. (2022) · Geophysics · doi:10.1190/geo2022-0184.1 · Cited by 1
Hu, L. Y., Luo, W., & Ma, B. (2024) · Minerals · doi:10.3390/min14040361 · Cited by 1
Tian, B., Zuo, S., Zheng, Y., Zhang, J., Du, J., & Tang, J. (2024) · Acta Oceanologica Sinica · doi:10.1007/s13131-023-2262-y · Cited by 2
Ge, Z., Gu, X., Zhang, Y., et al. (2025) · Ore Geology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2025.106566 · Cited by 1
Ferrill, N. L., Li, X., Tesauro, J., Sears, M., Bradley, G., Hilbert, A., Carney, E., Saxby, J., Mobasher, N., Kelley, B. M., et al. (2025) · Minerals · doi:10.3390/min15030324 · Cited by 1
“Limited fluid-inclusion T h data were available for calcite in this study (Figure 11), but similar calculations were performed to estimate the δ 18 O FLUID using values from [89].”
Song, X., Zhang, T., Peng, H., et al. (2025) · Minerals · doi:10.3390/min15050508 · Cited by 1
Zacca, P., Cioccari, G. M., Rodrigues, I. C., et al. (2025) · Journal of South American Earth Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jsames.2025.105631 · Cited by 1
Zhao, S., Liu, Y., Yue, L., Ma, W., Zheng, N., & Tang, B. (2025) · Earth Science-Journal of China University of Geosciences · doi:10.3799/dqkx.2024.076 · Cited by 1
The impact of CO2-charged fluids on the aqueous geochemistry of terrestrial aquifers
Lollar, G. S., Osburn, M. R., Casar, C. P., Rutledge, E. M., & Warr, O. (2025) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2025.08.009 · Cited by 1
Guo, X., Hua, Y., Wang, B., Yang, Z., He, Z., Dong, T., Liu, K., & He, S. (2025) · AAPG Bulletin · doi:10.1306/06132522006 · Cited by 2
Mohammadi, S. (2025) · Minerals · doi:10.3390/min15101076 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Friedman, I., & O'Neil, J. R.
- Venue
- Professional Paper
- Publisher
- US Geological Survey
- Published
- 1977
- ISSN
- 1044-9612 (ISSN-L)
- 2330-7102
- OpenAlex
- W1547907389
- Cited by
- 2,691
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 111 · 2019: 99 · 2018: 86 · 2017: 90 · 2016: 84 · 2015: 88 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 83 · 2012: 84
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- USGS professional paper (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geological and Geochemical Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
- Keywords
- stable isotope fractionation, fractionation factor, isotope geochemistry, mass-dependent fractionation, mass-independent fractionation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
