Cited by 59Polysaccharides Composition and ApplicationsSeaweed-derived Bioactive CompoundsAntimicrobial agents and applications

In vitro Bacteriostatic Effects on Dietary Polysaccharides.

YAMASHITA, Shusaku, SUGITA-KONISHI, Yoshiko, SHIMIZU, Makoto·2001·Food Science and Technology Research

Abstract

The antimicrobial action of dietary polysaccharides on eight food-borne pathogenic bacteria were examined. Among the polysaccharides, the carrageenans showed the most pronounced inhibitory effect, the growth of all the bacterial strains except Listeria monocytogenes being significantly inhibited by them, particularly by ι-carrageenan. A growth-inhibition experiment using Salmonella enteritidis showed that the inhibitory effect of the carrageenans was not bactericidal but bacteriostatic. The removal of sulfate residues eliminated the bacteriostatic effect of ι-carrageenan, suggesting that the sulfate residue(s) in carrageenan played an essential role in this effect. The results of the present study suggest that dietary polysaccharides, and particularly carrageenans, may act as effective preservatives in various types of processed food.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3136/fstr.7.262

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two theories explaining antimicrobial action of sulfated polysaccharides (carrageenans) proposed by Yamashita et al. [6]: binding to bacterial surface; trapping nutrients/cationic minerals.

    “There are two theories explaining the antimicrobial action of sulfated polysaccharides (carrageenans) proposed by Yamashita et al. [6]: one suggests the binding of the sulfated polysaccharides on the bacterial surface, although in an experiment using 3H-carrageenan, no binding for S. enteritidis was observed; the other suggests the trapping of nutrients or cationic minerals induced by the sulfated”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
YAMASHITA, S., SUGITA-KONISHI, Y., & SHIMIZU, M.
Affiliations
The University of Tokyo (JP)
Venue
Food Science and Technology Research
Published
2001
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
262-264
ISSN
  • 1344-6606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1881-3984
OpenAlex
W2033525005
Cited by
59
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Food Science and Technology Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Polysaccharides Composition and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Antimicrobial agents and applications
Keywords
dietary polysaccharides, carrageenan, bacteriostatic activity, foodborne pathogenic bacteria, Salmonella Enteritidis, Listeria monocytogenes, food preservatives, bacterial growth inhibition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review