Contacts with the Police and the Over-Representation of Indigenous Peoples in The Canadian Criminal Justice System
Abstract
There is abundant evidence of the over-representation of Indigenous peoples in Canadian correctional facilities but, there is, however, limited research on the over-representation of Indigenous peoples at other stages of the criminal justice system. This article examines self-reported contacts with the police by Indigenous peoples in Canada as a way to broaden our understanding of their over-representation in the criminal justice system. Settler colonialism is used as a theoretical framework to better assess the various processes by which Indigenous peoples and police may come into contact. Using data from the 2014 General Social Survey, we quantitatively examine the prevalence of various types of police contacts for Indigenous and non-Indigenous respondents. Results suggest that Indigenous peoples are more likely to encounter the police for a variety of reasons including for law enforcement reasons, for non-enforcement reasons, including being a victim or a witness to a crime, and for behavioural health-related issues. Results are discussed within the context of historical and ongoing settler colonial practices and the over-representation of Indigenous peoples in the criminal justice system.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Given their traumatic backgrounds, Indigenous persons have a higher chance of encountering the police compared to other Canadians.
“Generally, given their traumatic backgrounds, Indigenous persons have a higher chance of encountering the police compared to other Canadians (David & Mitchell, 2021; Lee et al., 2018).”
From Colonization, Normalization and Risk-Assessment: The Case of Youth Criminal Justice Act and Correctional Overrepresentation of Indigenous Youth in Canada (2025) · cites this paper as David & Mitchell, 2021
Cites
Settler colonialism and the elimination of the native
Wolfe, P. (2006) · Journal of Genocide Research · doi:10.1080/14623520601056240 · Cited by 6,491 · see citing works
Chartrand, V. (2019) · Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice · doi:10.3138/cjccj.2018-0029 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Decolonizing Research on the Carceral in Canadian Political Science
Mussell, L. (2023) · Canadian Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0008423923000288 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Barmaki, R. (2025) · International Criminology · doi:10.1007/s43576-025-00170-8 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- David, J.-D., & Mitchell, M.
- Affiliations
- McGill University (CA)
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- ORCID
- David, Jean-Denis
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice
- Published
- 2021-04-01
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 23-45
- ISSN
- 1707-7753 (ISSN-L)
- 1911-0219
- OpenAlex
- W3185751580
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5
- FWCI
- 6.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Keywords
- indigenous peoples, police encounters, settler colonialism, Indigenous peoples of Canada, victimization, behavioral health, criminal justice system
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review