The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Astroturfing as a strategy for manipulating public opinion on Twitter during the pandemic in Spain
Abstract
This work aims to establish whether astroturfing was used during the Covid-19 pandemic to manipulate Spanish public opinion through Twitter. This study analyzes tweets published in Spanish and geolocated in the Philippines, and its first objective is to determine the existence of an organized network that directs its messages mainly towards Spain. To determine the non-existence of a random network, a preliminary collection of 1,496,596 tweets was carried out. After determining its 14 main clusters, 280 users with a medium-low profile of participation and micro- and nano-influencer traits were randomly selected and followed for 103 days, for a total of 309,947 tweets. Network science, text mining, sentiment and emotion, and bot probability analyses were performed using Gephi and R. Their network structure suggests an ultra-small-world phenomenon, which would determine the existence of a possible organized network that tries not to be easily identifiable. The data analyzed confirm a digital communication scenario in which astroturfing is used as a strategy aimed at manipulating public opinion through non-influencers (cybertroops). These users create and disseminate content with proximity and closeness to different groups of public opinion, mixing topics of general interest with disinformation or polarized content.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Astroturfing is most frequently equated with political or commercial communications strategy”
From Beyond Verification| Inauthentic Authenticity: Astroturfing to Generate True Affect Using Fakery (2026) · cites this paper as Arce-García et al., 2022
In the citing paper
“Appearing in various sectors (Boulay, 2012), this strategy aims to manipulate public opinion (Arce-García et al., 2022;Boman & Schneider, 2021;García-Orosa, 2021;Henrie & Gilde, 2019;Mendelová, 2016;Seto, 2019) or influence government decisions (Laurens, 2015;Wear, 2014) and public policy (Al-Rawi & Rahman, 2020).”
From Beyond Verification| Inauthentic Authenticity: Astroturfing to Generate True Affect Using Fakery (2026) · cites this paper as Arce-García et al., 2022
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Granovetter, M. S. (1973) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/225469 · Cited by 40,491
Fast unfolding of communities in large networks
Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/p10008 · Cited by 21,424
Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks
Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937 · Cited by 11,675
Depth-First Search and Linear Graph Algorithms
Tarjan, R. (1972) · SIAM Journal on Computing · doi:10.1137/0201010 · Cited by 6,081
CROWDSOURCING A WORD–EMOTION ASSOCIATION LEXICON
Mohammad, S. M., & Turney, P. D. (2013) · Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8640.2012.00460.x · Cited by 2,634
On the Failure to Eliminate Hypotheses in a Conceptual Task
Wason, P. C. (1960) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470216008416717 · Cited by 2,098
Emotions Evoked by Common Words and Phrases: Using Mechanical Turk to Create an Emotion Lexicon
Mohammad, S. M., & Turney, P. D. (2010) · NPARC · Cited by 882
Information disorder toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policymaking
Wardle, C., Derakhshan, H., & Europarat (2017) · Cited by 857
Cross-cultural recognition of basic emotions through nonverbal emotional vocalizations
Sauter, D. A., Eisner, F., Ekman, P., & Scott, S. K. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0908239106 · Cited by 789
Mohammad, S. M. (2016) · Emotion Measurement · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-100508-8.00009-6 · Cited by 391
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Barabasi, Albert-László (2016). Network science. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge university press. ISBN: 978 1 107 07626 6
- European Commission (2018). A multi-dimensional approach to disinformation. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. ISBN: 978 92 79 80419 9 https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2759/739290 · doi:10.2759/739290 · Paper page
- Hu, Yifan (2006). “Efficient, high-quality force-directed graph drawing”. The mathematica journal, v. 10, n. 1, pp. 37-71. http://yifanhu.net/PUB/graph_draw.pdf
- Van-der-Veen, Han; Hiemstra, Djoerd; Van-den-Broek, Tijs; Ehrenhard, Michel; Need, Ariana (2015). “Determine the user country of a tweet”. Social and information networks. https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.02483 · arXiv
Cited by
Beyond Verification| Inauthentic Authenticity: Astroturfing to Generate True Affect Using Fakery
Alloing, C., Fournier, V., Reid, V., Germain, S., Turbide, O., & Yates, S. (2026) · International Journal of Communication · doi:10.65476/qd17zh66
Metadata
- Authors
- Arce-García, S., Said-Hung, E., & Mottareale, D.
- Affiliations
- Universidad Internacional de La Rioja
- Venue
- El Profesional de la información
- Published
- 2022-06-06
- ISSN
- 1699-2407
- 1386-6710
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 39
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Astroturfing as a strategy for manipulating public opinion on Twitter during the pandemic in Spain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3145/epi.2022.may.10
- The paper
- Arce-García, S., Said-Hung, E., & Mottareale, D. (2022). Astroturfing as a strategy for manipulating public opinion on Twitter during the pandemic in Spain. El Profesional de la información. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.may.10
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.