Cited by 1Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsSport Psychology and PerformanceCOVID-19 and Mental Health

Effectiveness of four components of mindfulness based on acceptance and commitment (MAC) on cognitive and physical anxiety of female athletes during the COVID-19 pandemic

Open access
FAHİMİ, Mahdi, AKBARPOUR BENİ, Mohsen, RAHMAN GHOLHAKİ, Melinaz, MİRGALOUYE BAYAT, Mobina·2023·Turkish Journal of Kinesiology

Abstract

The aim of the study was to test whether mindfulness based acceptance/commitment (MAC) could reduce cognitive-physical anxiety of female athletes to an active control group. This study was a semi-experimental design, Randomized controlled trail with an 8 week (16 sessions, 90 min each) and the active control group. Fifty female fitness athletes (Mage=25.14; SD=1.5) were randomly assigned either to MAC intervention or active control condition. All participations completed Kentucky Mindfulness Inventory (KIMS) and Smith Anxiety Inventory. MANOVA analyses were used to assess time by interactions. Significant value by group interaction effects were found for all outcomes. In the MAC group, Observational and Descriptive Aspects of Mindfulness are more effective in reducing cognitive anxiety rather than physical anxiety. In the active control group, the outcomes remained relatively stable. The present finding suggest that among female aerobic athletics, a MAC intervention has the potential to reduce cognitive and physical anxiety by increase observational and descriptive aspects more than Act with awareness, Accept without judgment aspects. The MAC model is one of the best systematic approaches to mindfulness training in sport psychology and has positive impact on performance, as well as the overall development of mental health and well-being.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31459/turkjkin.1316135

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • By promoting acceptance of negative thoughts and emotions, MAC reduces experiential avoidance, fosters cognitive flexibility, and improves metacognitive control, thereby helping athletes break cycles of rumination during performance.

    “By promoting acceptance of negative thoughts and emotions, MAC reduces experiential avoidance, fosters cognitive flexibility, and improves metacognitive control, thereby helping athletes break cycles of rumination during performance [58, 92].”

    From The Effect of Different Psychological Interventions on Athletes' Competitive Anxiety: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis. (2026) · cites this paper as [58]

    The Introduction (pp. 1–2) describes accepting thoughts and emotions without trying to escape or control them, and the Discussion (p. 9) says mindfulness exercises increase psychological flexibility in athletes. The Discussion (p. 8) also describes recognizing negative-thought patterns before being drawn into a vicious cycle. The paper does not establish improved metacognitive control or show that MAC breaks cycles of rumination during performance. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • MAC may enhance attention and awareness of present thoughts and emotions, which could facilitate regulation of disruptive feelings.

    “The intervention may enhance attention and awareness of present thoughts and emotions, which could facilitate regulation of disruptive feelings [58, 90, 91].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hadinezhad, A. (2012). Survey psychometric properties of Sport Anxiety Scale between elite athletes of Tehran city. Master Thesis, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Center Branch, Tehran. (In Persian).
  2. Zadkhosh, S. M., Gharayagh Zandi, H., & Hemayattalab, R. (2019). The effects of mindfulness on anxiety decrease and athletic performance enhancement of young football players. J Sport Psychol, 8(27), 41-54.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
FAHİMİ, M., AKBARPOUR BENİ, M., RAHMAN GHOLHAKİ, M., & MİRGALOUYE BAYAT, M.
Affiliations
  • shahab danesh university
  • University of Qom
  • university of Qom
Venue
Turkish Journal of Kinesiology
Published
2023-09-30
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
158-168
ISSN
2459-0134 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386203046
Cited by
1
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
0.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Turkish Journal of Kinesiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DergiPark (Istanbul University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
university of Qom
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
mindfulness-based acceptance and commitment therapy, cognitive anxiety, somatic anxiety, female athletes, COVID-19 pandemic, mindfulness training, sport psychology intervention, active control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review