CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 24scientometrics and bibliometrics researchHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilityLibrary Science and Information

Analyzing the impact of an author’s publications

Open access
Vucovich, Lee A., Blaine Baker, Jason, Smith, Jack T.·2008·Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA
DOI 10.3163/1536-5050.96.1.63PMC PMC2212341
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Table 1 Spanish Access to Literature/Uso Directo (SALUD) Public Health Information Pilot Project objectives 1. Develop a cadre of community health nursing students who are knowledgeable in accessing and evaluating health education materials and who would use and share these skills in practice in the community 2. Develop a pilot project, based on the needs assessment, to increase patient health education by improving access to quality reading-level and language-appropriate materials in two Chicago Department of Public Health public health clinics serving inner-city, low-income, predominately Latino populations 3. Increase access to and knowledge about quality health information resources for health care practitioners working in two inner city clinics Sustainable collaboration for community outreach: lessons from the Spanish Access to Literature/Uso Directo (SALUD) project

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3163/1536-5050.96.1.63

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Egghe L, Rousseau R. Introduction to infometrics: quan- titative methods in library, documentation, and information science. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Pub- lishers, 1990.
  2. Garfield E. The agony and the ecstasy-the history and meaning of the journal impact factor. Presented at: 5th Inter- national Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication; Chicago, IL; Sep 16, 2005. [cited 6 Jun 2007] Ͻhttp://www .garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/jifchicago2005.pdfϾ.
  3. Rice RE, Borgman CL, Bednarski D, Hart PJ. Journal-to- journal citation data-issues of validity and reliability. Scien- tometrics 1989 Mar;15(3-4):257-82.
  4. Jacso P. As we may search-comparison of major fea- tures of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar ci- tation-based and citation-enhanced databases. Curr Sci 2005 Nov 10;89(9):1537-47.
  5. Klassen TP, Jadad AR, Moher D. Guides for reading and interpreting systematic reviews: I. getting started. Arch Pe- diatr Adolesc Med 1998 Jul;152(7):700-4.
  6. Sampson M, McGowan J. Evidence review: evaluating health technology assessment searches. Presented at: XIII Cochrane Colloquium; Melbourne, Australia; Oct 22, 2005.
  7. Sampson M, McGowan J, Lefebvre C, Moher D, Grimshaw JM. PRESS: Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies. CADTH Technical Report 2007. (Available at: Ͻhttp:// www.cadth.caϾ. [cited 6 Nov 2007].)
  8. McGowan J, Sampson M, Santesso N. Collection devel- opment in support of Cochrane reviews: normative data on sources and database interface from 105 Cochrane reviews. Presented at: Upstate New York and Ontario Chapter of the Medical Library Association Annual Conference; Ottawa, ON, Canada; Oct 13, 2004.
  9. Eldredge JD. Evidence-based librarianship: searching for the needed EBL evidence. Med Ref Serv Q 2000 Fall;19(3):1- 18.
  10. Kleijnen J, Knipschild P. The comprehensiveness of Med- line and Embase computer searches. searches for controlled trials of homeopathy, ascorbic acid for common cold and ginkgo biloba for cerebral insufficiency and intermittent claudication. Pharmaceutisch Weekblad Sci Ed 1992 Oct; 14(5):316-20.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Vucovich, L. A., Blaine Baker, J., & Smith, J. T.
Affiliations
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
ORCID
Vucovich, Lee A.
Venue
Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA
Publisher
University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
Published
2008-01
Volume
96
Issue
1
Pages
63-66
ISSN
  • 1536-5050 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-9439
DOI
10.3163/1536-5050.96.1.63
PMC
PMC2212341
OpenAlex
W2064961604
Cited by
24
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of the Medical Library Association JMLA (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Library Science and Information
Keywords
health information access, health education materials, patient education, public health clinics, Latino population, low-income populations, inner-city clinics, health information sources, community outreach
MeSH terms
Alabama, Authorship, Humans, Libraries, Medical, Periodicals as Topic, Bibliometrics, Information Storage and Retrieval, Organizational Case Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review