Cited by 9Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyCrop Yield and Soil FertilityAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

The effects of calcium hydroxide–treated whole-plant and fractionated corn silage on intake, digestion, and lactation performance in dairy cows

Open access
Cook, D.E., Bender, R.W., Shinners, K.J., Combs, D.K.·2016·Journal of Dairy Science

Abstract

The objective of this trial was to evaluate, in dairy cattle, the effects of calcium hydroxide treatment of whole-plant corn and a treatment applied to the bottom stalk fraction of the corn plant, achieved by harvesting corn in 2 crop streams. The treatments were calcium hydroxide-treated corn silage (TRTCS), toplage supplemented with calcium hydroxide-treated stalklage (TPL), a positive control of brown midrib corn silage (BMR), and a negative control of conventional whole-plant corn silage (WPCS). The toplage was harvested at a height of 82 cm with 2 of the 6 rows set as ear-snapping to incorporate higher tissues into the stalklage. Stalklage was harvested at 12 cm, and other corn silages were harvested at 27 cm. Sixteen pens, each with 8 Holstein cows averaging 70±25 d in milk and 46±11 kg of milk d(-1), were assigned 4 per treatment in a completely randomized design. The diet was approximately 40% corn silage, 20% alfalfa silage, and 40% concentrate on a dry matter basis. A 2-wk covariate period with conventional corn silage was followed by an 8-wk treatment period in which the 4 corn silage treatments were the only effective difference in diets. Cows fed TPL and TRTCS consumed more (1.9 and 1.4 kg of organic matter d(-1), respectively) than did cows fed WPCS. Milk yield was greater for cows fed BMR, TPL, and TRTCS. Cows fed BMR and TPL produced 2.9 and 2.7 kg d(-1), respectively, more energy-corrected milk (ECM) than cows fed WPCS, and cows fed TRTCS had the greatest ECM production (4.8 kg of ECM d(-1) greater than cows fed WPCS). No differences in body weight or body condition scored were observed. Milk fat concentration was similar among treatments and milk protein concentration was reduced for TRTCS. Starch and neutral detergent fiber digestibility were greater for cows fed TRTCS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.2015-10402

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Alkali-treatment of whole-plant corn silage and fractionated whole-plant corn silage were successful at improving intake and milk production by dairy cows similarly to the well-established effects of brown midrib whole-plant corn silage.

    “Overall, alkali-treatment of WPCS and fractionated WPCS were successful at improving intake and milk production by dairy cows similarly to the well-established effects of BMR WPCS.”
  • Fractionation of corn plants at harvest could be used as a tool in ration formulation; for example, by separating and feeding the less digestible fraction, the stalks, to animals of lower energetic demand.

    “Cook et al. (2016) suggested this fractionation of corn plants at harvest could be used as a tool in ration formulation; for example, by separating and feeding the less digestible fraction, the stalks, to animals of lower energetic demand (i.e., heifers, far-off dry cows).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [21]21. NRC. 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th rev. ed. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cook, D. E., Bender, R. W., Shinners, K. J., & Combs, D. K.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Combs, D.K.
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2016-07
Volume
99
Issue
7
Pages
5385-5393
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2346240381
Cited by
9
References
30
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
calcium hydroxide treatment, corn silage, whole-plant corn, dairy cattle, milk yield, feed intake, starch digestibility, neutral detergent fiber digestibility, milk protein, milk fat, Holstein cows
MeSH terms
Alkalies, Animals, Calcium Hydroxide, Cattle, Zea mays, Dairying, Diet, Dietary Fiber, Feeding Behavior, Female, Lactation, Milk, Random Allocation, Silage, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review